Sensitivity in binding free energies due to protein reorganization

Tremendous recent improvements in computer hardware, coupled with advances in sampling techniques and force fields, are now allowing protein-ligand binding free energy calculations to be routinely used to aid pharmaceutical drug discovery projects. However, despite these recent innovations, there are still needs for further improvement in sampling algorithms to more adequately sample protein motion relevant to protein-ligand binding. Here, we report our work identifying and studying such clear and remaining needs in the apolar cavity of T4 Lysozyme L99A. In this study, we model recent experimental results that show the progressive opening of the binding pocket in response to a series of homologous ligands.1 Even while using enhanced sampling techniques, we demonstrate that the predicted relative binding free energies (RBFE) are sensitive to the initial protein conformational state. Particularly, we highlight the importance of sufficient sampling of protein conformational changes and demonstrate how inclusion of three key protein residues in the ‘hot’ region of the FEP/REST simulation improves the sampling and resolves this sensitivity.

[1]  Zaida Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Multiple Alignment of protein structures and sequences for VMD , 2006, Bioinform..

[2]  Terry Richard Stouch Looking forward into the next 25 years: the 25th anniversary issue of the Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[3]  B. Berne,et al.  Replica exchange with solute tempering: a method for sampling biological systems in explicit water. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  David E. Shaw,et al.  The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery , 2011, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[5]  David L Mobley,et al.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  Absolute Binding Free Energies: A Quantitative Approach for Their Calculation , 2003 .

[7]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[9]  J Hermans,et al.  Modeling protein-small molecule interactions: structure and thermodynamics of noble gases binding in a cavity in mutant phage T4 lysozyme L99A. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  David L Mobley,et al.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  W. Sherman,et al.  Probing the α‐Helical Structural Stability of Stapled p53 Peptides: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Analysis , 2010, Chemical biology & drug design.

[13]  Edward D Harder,et al.  How To Deal with Multiple Binding Poses in Alchemical Relative Protein–Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[14]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Free Energy Perturbation Hamiltonian Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Lingle Wang,et al.  On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein–ligand binding affinities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  W. Sherman,et al.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  Advances in all atom sampling methods for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  Kenneth Lundstrom,et al.  An Overview on GPCRs and Drug Discovery: Structure-Based Drug Design and Structural Biology on GPCRs , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[19]  B. Matthews,et al.  Similar hydrophobic replacements of Leu99 and Phe153 within the core of T4 lysozyme have different structural and thermodynamic consequences. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Lu Wang,et al.  Inclusion of Loss of Translational and Rotational Freedom in Theoretical Estimates of Free Energies of Binding. Application to a Complex of Benzene and Mutant T4 Lysozyme , 1997 .

[21]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Homologous ligands accommodated by discrete conformations of a buried cavity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Practical Aspects of Free-Energy Calculations: A Review. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  B. Matthews,et al.  Energetic origins of specificity of ligand binding in an interior nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[25]  K. Dill,et al.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data , 1976 .

[27]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Decoys for docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  Federico D. Sacerdoti,et al.  Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters , 2006, ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06).

[30]  Wei Yang,et al.  Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  λ‐Dynamics free energy simulation methods , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  Wayne A Hendrickson,et al.  What is 'current opinion' in structural biology? , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[33]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Modeling Local Structural Rearrangements Using FEP/REST: Application to Relative Binding Affinity Predictions of CDK2 Inhibitors. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  B. Matthews,et al.  Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. , 1992, Science.

[35]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  N. Aiyar,et al.  G protein-coupled receptors in drug discovery. , 2003, Assay and drug development technologies.

[37]  E. Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  A temperature accelerated method for sampling free energy and determining reaction pathways in rare events simulations , 2006 .

[38]  K. Dill,et al.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get". , 2009, Structure.

[39]  Frank Noé,et al.  An Introduction to Markov State Models and Their Application to Long Timescale Molecular Simulation , 2014, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[40]  B. Matthews,et al.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[41]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[42]  B. Berne,et al.  Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  Stefan Schmitt,et al.  Do structurally similar ligands bind in a similar fashion? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  H. Then,et al.  Characteristic of Bennett's acceptance ratio method. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies:  Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[46]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[47]  J. Thornton,et al.  Conformational changes observed in enzyme crystal structures upon substrate binding. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  D. Frenkel Free-energy calculations , 1991 .

[49]  Shuai Liu,et al.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[50]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[51]  Ron Elber,et al.  Long-timescale simulation methods. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[52]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Binding Free Energy Calculations for Lead Optimization: Assessment of Their Accuracy in an Industrial Drug Design Context. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[53]  J. Mongan,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[54]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  B. Matthews,et al.  A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.