Secondary predication and the lexical representation of verbs

In this paper it is assumed that syntactic structure is projected from the lexicon. The lexical representation, which encodes the linguistically relevant aspects of the meanings of words, thus determines and constrains the syntax. Therefore, if semantic analysis of syntactic structures is to be possible, it is necessary to determine the content and structure of lexical semantic representations. The paper argues for a certain form of lexical representation by presenting the problem of a particular non-standard structure, the verb phrase of the form V-NP-Adj corresponding to various constructions of secondary predication in English. It is demonstrated that the solution to the semantic analysis of this structure lies in the meaning of the structure's predicators, in particular the lexical semantic representation of the verb. Verbs are classified according to the configuration of the lexical semantic representations, whether basic or derived. It is these specific configurations that restrict the possibilities of secondary predication. Given the class of a verb, its relation to the secondary predicate is predictable; and the correct interpretation of the V-NP-Adj string is therefore possible.

[1]  D. Green.  Contrasted melting relations in a pyrolite upper mantle under mid-oceanic ridge, stable crust and island arc environments , 1973 .

[2]  Susan Rothstein.  The Syntactic Forms of Predication , 2004 .

[3]  Edwin Williams,et al.  NP trace in theta theory , 1987 .

[4]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  Machine translation: theoretical and methodological issues , 1987 .

[5]  Tova Rebecca Rapoport.  Copular, nominal, and small clauses : a study of Israeli Hebrew , 1987 .

[6]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax , 1987 .

[7]  Jane Simpson,et al.  Aspects of Warlpiri morphology and syntax , 1983 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory , 1975 .

[9]  D. Bolinger.  The phrasal verb in English , 1974 .

[10]  D. Massam.  Cognate Objects as Thematic Objects , 1990, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[11]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  Light Predicate Raising * , 2001 .

[12]  Mary Laughren,et al.  Levels of Lexical Representation , 1993 .

[13]  Elaine Marie McNulty.  The syntax of adjunct predicates , 1988 .

[14]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[15]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[16]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  A view from the middle , 1987 .

[17]  Ray Jackendoff.  Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[18]  Z. Vendler.  Linguistics in Philosophy , 1967 .

[19]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[20]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  Knowledge representation support , 1989, Machine Translation.

[21]  L. Rizzi.  Null objects in Italian and the theory of 'pro' , 1986 .