Design of robotic manipulators for orbit removal of spent launchers’ stages

Abstract This paper deals with the main drivers for the design of a space manipulator aimed to the removal of the final stages which remain in Low Earth Orbit after releasing their payloads. At the scope, the different phases of a debris removal mission are considered, starting from the parking orbit where the servicing spacecraft equipped with the manipulator (chaser) waits for the call on duty, encompassing the approach to the target and its grasping and finally dealing with the dismissal of the captured object. The characteristics and requirements of each phase, in terms of torques to be applied to the joints of the manipulator(s) and to the forces to be generated via thrusters at the system level, are analysed. The number of robotic arms, the number of joints of each arm, and the torque level that each joint motor should supply are mainly defined by the grasping phase and the de-orbit phase. During the grasping, the tumbling target must be tracked with a large degree of robustness, and, to this aim, a redundant manipulator must be designed, so that its workspace can be as large as possible. On the other hand, increasing the degrees of freedom of a robotic arm means higher complexity and manufacturing costs. The number of arms depends also on the final de-orbit phase, in which the powerful apogee motor of the chaser satellite is ignited to change the composite system (chaser+target) orbit. The thrust, applied on the chaser, is transferred to the target by means of the manipulator(s): it is shown that a single robotic arm could not be sufficient to withstand the high stress acting during this phase. The torques at the joints required to maintain the arms in the desired configuration end up to be very high too, and the motors – as well as in general the structural elements of the arms – should be sized according to this phase of the mission.

[1]  R. Boumans,et al.  The European Robotic Arm for the International Space Station , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Momentum distribution in a space manipulator for facilitating the post-impact control , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[3]  Marcel J. Sidi,et al.  Spacecraft Dynamics and Control: A Practical Engineering Approach , 1997 .

[4]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Ground tests for vision based determination and control of formation flying spacecraft trajectories , 2014 .

[5]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Space Robot Impact Analysis and Satellite-Base Impulse Minimization Using Reaction Null-Space , 1995, ICRA.

[6]  Steven Dubowsky,et al.  A coordinated Jacobian transpose control for mobile multi-limbed robotic systems , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Christophe Bonnal,et al.  Active debris removal: Recent progress and current trends , 2013 .

[8]  Kazuharu Nara,et al.  International Space Station Robotics: A Comparative Study of ERA, JEMRMS and MSS , 2002 .

[9]  Farhad Aghili,et al.  Adaptive motion estimation of a tumbling satellite using laser-vision data with unknown noise characteristics , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Bong Wie,et al.  Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control , 1998 .

[11]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Adaptive Thrust Vector Control during On-Orbit Servicing , 2014 .

[12]  Marco M. Castronuovo,et al.  Active space debris removal—A preliminary mission analysis and design , 2011 .

[13]  Marco Sabatini,et al.  Deployment analysis and control strategies of flexible space manipulators , 2013 .

[14]  David L. Akin,et al.  Enabling Dexterous Manipulation and Servicing by Smallsats , 2012 .

[15]  Reza N. Jazar,et al.  Advanced Dynamics: Rigid Body, Multibody, and Aerospace Applications , 2011 .

[16]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Optimal target grasping of a flexible space manipulator for a class of objectives , 2011 .

[17]  Roberto Opromolla,et al.  Spaceborne LIDAR-based system for pose determination of uncooperative targets , 2014, 2014 IEEE Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace).

[18]  G. Oriolo,et al.  Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control , 2008 .

[19]  Minzhou Luo,et al.  Autonomous Grasping of a Space Robot Multisensory Gripper , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Ou Ma,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2014 .

[21]  Klaus Landzettel,et al.  Dexhand: A Space qualified multi-fingered robotic hand , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Rajnish Kumar,et al.  System requirements and design features of Space Station Remote Manipulator System mechanisms , 1991 .

[23]  G. Palmerini,et al.  A reaction-null/Jacobian transpose control strategy with gravity gradient compensation for on-orbit space manipulators , 2014 .

[24]  S. Ali A. Moosavian,et al.  Modified transpose Jacobian control of robotic systems , 2007, Autom..

[25]  W. H. Clohessy,et al.  Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous , 2012 .

[26]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .