Determination of Agility in Elderly using Assistive Device by 8 Foot Up and Go Test

Background: With increasing age agility starts declining. Use of an assistive device hopefully aids in improving balance, agility, and confidence. There are fewer studies of objective quantification of agility with the use of the assistive device. This study aims to determine the agility in elderly using an assistive device by 8 foot up and go test. Methods: A comparative, experimental study was done on 60 Healthy adults of age 75 to 85 years. Subjects were asked to perform 8 foot up and go agility test initially without assistive device and then with an assistive device. The time in seconds was noted respectively. The mean of the two trials each was calculated. The data were analyzed using the paired t-test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in mean agility score on 8 foot up and go test between subjects without an assistive device (12.33 ± 3.21 seconds) and with an assistive device (13.33 ± 3.39 seconds). Subjects when given assistive device took a longer time to complete the 8 foot up and go agility test than they required for completing it without an assistive device. Conclusion: There was a significant decrease in agility in elderly using an assistive device as shown by the increase in time taken to complete the 8 foot up and go agility test. There is a need for cautious clinical prescription practice for mobility aids.

[1]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta- analysis , 2014, BMC Geriatrics.

[2]  Linamara Rizzo Battistella,et al.  Functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises , 2010, Clinical interventions in aging.

[3]  Ayşe Toraman,et al.  The falling risk and physical fitness in older people. , 2010, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[4]  Sara M. Bradley,et al.  Geriatric assistive devices. , 2011, American family physician.

[5]  Hao Howe Liu,et al.  Assessment of canes used by older adults in senior living communities. , 2011, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[6]  M. Chren,et al.  Use of a Cane for Ambulation: Marker and Mitigator of Impairment in Older People Who Report No Difficulty Walking , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  Yutaka Yoshitake,et al.  Physical fitness and 6.5-year mortality in an 85-year-old community-dwelling population. , 2012, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[8]  L. Campanelli,et al.  Mobility Changes in Older Adults: Implications for Practitioners , 1996 .

[9]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and Cognitive Deficits , 1982 .

[10]  M. Wong,et al.  Temporal stride and force analysis of cane-assisted gait in people with hemiplegic stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Hulya Donat Tuna,et al.  Effect of age and physical activity level on functional fitness in older adults , 2009, European Review of Aging and Physical Activity.

[12]  Nic James,et al.  Age-related decrease in physical activity and functional fitness among elderly men and women , 2013, Clinical interventions in aging.

[13]  Debra J. Rose,et al.  Predicting the Probability of Falls in Community-Residing Older Adults Using the 8-Foot Up-and-Go: A New Measure of Functional Mobility , 2002 .

[14]  José M. Cancela,et al.  The "8-foot Up and Go" Test as a Physical Performance Measurement in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study. , 2013 .

[15]  Louise Ada,et al.  The provision of a cane provides greater benefit to community-dwelling people after stroke with a baseline walking speed between 0.4 and 0.8 metres/second: an experimental study. , 2016, Physiotherapy.

[16]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.