First-Line Systemic Treatment Strategies for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Objective Several new first-line treatments were recently approved for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this meta-analysis, we compare the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic treatments to provide information for clinical decision making in unresectable HCC. Methods Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and the Wanfang databases, as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails were searched for randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy for unresectable HCC. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to explore the effects of various treatment options on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas odd ratios with 95% CIs were used for adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). A network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and for direct and indirect comparisons between treatments. The cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and P score were used to rank treatments. The risk of bias across studies was assessed graphically and numerically using the funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. Results Fifteen studies including 9005 patients were analyzed. Sintilimab plus bevacizumab, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and donafenib had better OS outcomes than sorafenib. Sintilimab plus bevacizumab, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib, and linifanib had better PFS outcomes than sorafenib. The results of network meta-analysis showed that sintilimab plus bevacizumab was associated with the best OS and PFS. Egger’s tests indicated that none of the included studies had obvious publication deviation. Conclusion Sintilimab plus bevacizumab showed the best OS and PFS outcomes with no additional AEs or SAEs. Thus, sintilimab plus bevacizumab may be a better first line choice for the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC. Systematic Review Registration PROSPEROI [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/index.php], identifier CRD42021269734.

[1]  F. Chen,et al.  Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Jinhai Wang,et al.  Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  R. Sacco,et al.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2020, Vaccines.

[4]  M. Kudo,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Previously Treated With Sorafenib , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[5]  M. Iannacone,et al.  Immune surveillance of the liver by T cells , 2020, Science Immunology.

[6]  W. Gu,et al.  Sorafenib in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and microvascular infiltration: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, The Journal of international medical research.

[7]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: From preclinical mechanisms to anti-cancer therapy. , 2020, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer.

[8]  M. Lee,et al.  Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning Classifier: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  M. Lee,et al.  Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning Classifier: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Yulei N. Wang,et al.  Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  L. Woon,et al.  Nivolumab for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2020 .

[12]  W. Dai,et al.  Simvastatin re-sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting HIF-1α/PPAR-γ/PKM2-mediated glycolysis , 2020, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  W. Dai,et al.  Simvastatin re-sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting HIF-1α/PPAR-γ/PKM2-mediated glycolysis , 2020, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  R. Sacco,et al.  Efficacy of Regorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, Cancers.

[15]  N. Gray,et al.  Comparison of effects of midostaurin, crenolanib, quizartinib, gilteritinib, sorafenib and BLU‐285 on oncogenic mutants of KIT, CBL and FLT3 in haematological malignancies , 2019, British journal of haematology.

[16]  Zhonglin Hao,et al.  Lenvatinib in Management of Solid Tumors. , 2019, The oncologist.

[17]  M. Kudo,et al.  CheckMate 459: A randomized, multi-center phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[18]  K. Syrigos,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Assessment of Treatment With Sorafenib Plus Doxorubicin vs Sorafenib Alone in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Phase 3 CALGB 80802 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[20]  Zaina T. Al-Salama,et al.  Lenvatinib: A Review in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2019, Drugs.

[21]  M. Ychou,et al.  Sorafenib alone vs. sorafenib plus GEMOX as 1st-line treatment for advanced HCC: the phase II randomised PRODIGE 10 trial , 2019, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  Li Jin,et al.  The trends in incidence of primary liver cancer caused by specific etiologies: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and implications for liver cancer prevention. , 2019, Journal of hepatology.

[23]  Sheridan M. Hoy Sintilimab: First Global Approval , 2019, Drugs.

[24]  M. Cabanillas,et al.  Managing the adverse events associated with lenvatinib therapy in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. , 2019, Seminars in oncology.

[25]  M. Kudo Recent Advances in Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an Aging Society: 2020 Update , 2018, Liver Cancer.

[26]  T. Zheng,et al.  Role of ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma , 2018, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Kudo,et al.  Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[28]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[30]  M. Kudo,et al.  Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[31]  G. Keating Sorafenib: A Review in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2017, Targeted Oncology.

[32]  Myung Ah Lee,et al.  Resminostat and sorafenib combination therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in patients previously untreated with systemic chemotherapy. , 2017 .

[33]  Masatoshi Kudo,et al.  Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[34]  R. Addeo,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Will novel targeted drugs really impact the next future? , 2016, World journal of gastroenterology.

[35]  A. Luciani,et al.  Programmed death ligand 1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: Relationship With clinical and pathological features , 2016, Hepatology.

[36]  G. Tiegs,et al.  Modulation of liver tolerance by conventional and nonconventional antigen-presenting cells and regulatory immune cells , 2016, Cellular & Molecular Immunology.

[37]  A. Taketomi Clinical trials of antiangiogenic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2016, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  M. Kudo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of tigatuzumab plus sorafenib as first-line therapy in subjects with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase 2 randomized study. , 2015, Journal of hepatology.

[39]  J. Bruix,et al.  SEARCH: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sorafenib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Linifanib versus Sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Reduce dimension or reduce weights? Comparing two approaches to multi‐arm studies in network meta‐analysis , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[42]  L. Jeng,et al.  Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  M. Kudo,et al.  Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  J. Prieto,et al.  A clinical trial of CTLA-4 blockade with tremelimumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic hepatitis C. , 2013, Journal of hepatology.

[45]  V. Nitti,et al.  Results of a randomized phase III trial of mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[46]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[47]  P. Gargiulo,et al.  A case of GH deficiency and beta-thalassemia. , 2012, Minerva endocrinologica.

[48]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[49]  M. Joerger,et al.  Antiangiogenic Drugs in Oncology: A Focus on Drug Safety and the Elderly – A Mini-Review , 2009, Gerontology.

[50]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Drug delivery with carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer treatment. , 2008, Cancer research.

[51]  Dieter Häussinger,et al.  Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  A. Hackshaw,et al.  A phase III randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of gemcitabine/carboplatin with or without thalidomide in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , 2007 .

[53]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  A. Pillai,et al.  Goals and targets for personalized therapy for HCC , 2019, Hepatology International.

[55]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  Yoon-Koo Kang,et al.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.