Flow pattern visualization of a simulated digester.

Mixing patterns inside a simulated flat bottom digester were imaged using the non-invasive techniques of computer automated radioactive particle tracking (CARPT) and computed tomography (CT). Mixing/agitation was provided using gas (air) recirculation at three different flow rates (Q(g)) of 28.32, 56.64 and 84.96 l/h, corresponding to superficial gas velocities of 0.025, 0.05 and 0.075 cm/s, respectively. Better mixing was observed in the upper zone near the top of the draft tube. However, at the bottom of the digester there was a total stagnancy at all the three gas flow rates. The maximum value of the time-averaged axial velocity inside the draft tube, at a gas flow rate of 84.96 l/h, was observed as 34.4 cm/s. The turbulent kinetic energy was observed to be maximum (724 dyn/cm(2)) inside the draft tube, and decreases radially toward the wall of the digester. The present study showed that the CARPT and CT techniques could be successfully used to identify the flow pattern in the digester and to calculate velocity and turbulence parameters quantitatively. On the other hand, the increase in gas circulation rate from 28.32 to 84.96 l/h did not significantly reduce the dead zones inside the flat bottom digester. To achieve the desired mixing and reactor performance, the operating conditions and reactor configuration need to be optimized.

[1]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance. , 2001, Water research.

[2]  Jun Sawai,et al.  Liquid circulation and critical gas velocity in slurry bubble column with short size draft tube , 1999 .

[3]  Sailesh Kumar,et al.  A γ-ray tomographic scanner for imaging voidage distribution in two-phase flow systems , 1995 .

[4]  L. T. Angenent,et al.  Development of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system. , 2001, Water research.

[5]  A. S. Monin,et al.  Statistical Fluid Mechanics: The Mechanics of Turbulence , 1998 .

[6]  A. E. Sáez,et al.  Effect of draft tube position on the hydrodynamics of a draft tube slurry bubble column , 1995 .

[7]  Sailesh Kumar,et al.  Gas‐holdup measurements in bubble columns using computed tomography , 1997 .

[8]  D. Lloyd,et al.  Hydrogen-dependent control of the continuous anaerobic digestion process , 1987, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  Shantanu Roy,et al.  Numerical simulation of gas}liquid dynamics in cylindrical bubble column reactors , 1999 .

[10]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Gas holdup in bubble columns at elevated pressure via computed tomography , 2001 .

[11]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Particle motion in packed/ebullated beds by CT and CARPT , 2001 .

[12]  J. Dolfing The energetic consequences of hydrogen gradients in methanogenic ecosystems , 1992 .

[13]  P. Lusk,et al.  Methane Recovery from Animal Manures The Current Opportunities Casebook , 1994 .

[14]  R. R. Dague,et al.  Laboratory studies on the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor , 1995 .

[15]  Richard R. Dague,et al.  A laboratory-scale comparison of the UASB and ASBR processes , 1996 .

[16]  M. Duduković,et al.  A method for estimating the solids circulation rate in a closed-loop circulating fluidized bed , 2001 .

[17]  Richard E. Speece,et al.  Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters , 1996 .