Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Geisler,et al. Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[2] A E Burgess,et al. Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[3] Kenneth M. Hanson,et al. Method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms based on task performance , 1990 .
[4] B. Tsui,et al. Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.
[5] A. Burgess. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.
[6] H. Kundel,et al. The influence of structured noise on the detection of radiologic abnormalities. , 1974, Investigative radiology.
[7] Donald W. Wilson,et al. Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .
[8] E. DeLong,et al. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.
[9] R. F. Wagner,et al. Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] D G Brown,et al. Detection performance of the ideal decision function and its McLaurin expansion: signal position unknown. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm , 1996, Medical Imaging.
[12] Kyle J. Myers,et al. Beyond Signal-Detection Theory , 1986, Other Conferences.