An automated device for the digitization and 3D modelling of insects, combining extended-depth-of-field and all-side multi-view imaging

Abstract Digitization of natural history collections is a major challenge in archiving biodiversity. In recent years, several approaches have emerged, allowing either automated digitization, extended depth of field (EDOF) or multi-view imaging of insects. Here, we present DISC3D: a new digitization device for pinned insects and other small objects that combines all these aspects. A PC and a microcontroller board control the device. It features a sample holder on a motorized two-axis gimbal, allowing the specimens to be imaged from virtually any view. Ambient, mostly reflection-free illumination is ascertained by two LED-stripes circularly installed in two hemispherical white-coated domes (front-light and back-light). The device is equipped with an industrial camera and a compact macro lens, mounted on a motorized macro rail. EDOF images are calculated from an image stack using a novel calibrated scaling algorithm that meets the requirements of the pinhole camera model (a unique central perspective). The images can be used to generate a calibrated and real color texturized 3Dmodel by ‘structure from motion’ with a visibility consistent mesh generation. Such models are ideal for obtaining morphometric measurement data in 1D, 2D and 3D, thereby opening new opportunities for trait-based research in taxonomy, phylogeny, eco-physiology, and functional ecology.

[1]  D. Emlen.  Diet alters male horn allometry in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Jan Boehm,et al.  Close-Range Photogrammetry and 3D Imaging , 2013 .

[3]  J. Brecko,et al.  Bringing collections to the digital era three examples of integrated high resolution digitisation projects , 2015, 2015 Digital Heritage.

[4]  Jonathan Brecko,et al.  Comparing 3D digitizing technologies: What are the differences? , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[5]  Maurizio Muzzupappa,et al.  3D reconstruction of small sized objects from a sequence of multi-focused images , 2014 .

[6]  Jean-Philippe Pons,et al.  High Accuracy and Visibility-Consistent Dense Multiview Stereo , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[8]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[10]  Sebastian Schmelzle,et al.  The ptychoid defensive mechanism in Euphthiracaroidea (Acari: Oribatida): a comparison of muscular elements with functional considerations. , 2009, Arthropod structure & development.

[11]  S. Ullman.  The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. Sigwart,et al.  How long is a piece of Strix? Methods in measuring and measuring the measurers , 2010, Zoomorphology.

[13]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[14]  H. Tatsuta,et al.  Geometric morphometrics in entomology: Basics and applications , 2018 .

[15]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Shape-From-Silhouette Across Time Part I: Theory and Algorithms , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Penny Berents,et al.  TOWARDS DEMAND DRIVEN PUBLISHING: APPROCHES TO THE PRIORITISATION OF DIGITISATION OF NATURAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS DATA , 2010 .

[18]  P. Cloetens,et al.  Imaging applications of synchrotron X‐ray phase‐contrast microtomography in biological morphology and biomaterials science. I. General aspects of the technique and its advantages in the analysis of millimetre‐sized arthropod structure , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  Wendy Moore.  Biology needs cyberinfrastructure to facilitate specimen-level data acquisition for insects and other hyperdiverse groups , 2011, ZooKeys.

[20]  Matt Adcock,et al.  Capturing Natural-Colour 3D Models of Insects for Species Discovery and Diagnostics , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Surface area–volume ratios in insects , 2017, Insect science.

[22]  Lawrence N. Hudson,et al.  Inselect: Automating the Digitization of Natural History Collections , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  Joseph A. Tobias,et al.  Quantitative criteria for species delimitation , 2010 .

[24]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[25]  D. Goulson,et al.  Effects of climate on intra- and interspecific size variation in bumble-bees , 2005 .

[26]  SAMIR AROUDJ,et al.  Visibility-consistent thin surface reconstruction using multi-scale kernels , 2017, ACM Trans. Graph..

[27]  Martijn Van Roie,et al.  The use of low cost compact cameras with focus stacking functionality in entomological digitization projects , 2017, ZooKeys.

[28]  David Mouillot,et al.  A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[30]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[31]  Jonathan Brecko,et al.  Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens , 2014, ZooKeys.

[32]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  The relationship between epicuticular long-chained hydrocarbons and surface area - volume ratios in insects (Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera) , 2017, PloS one.

[33]  O Hammer-Muntz,et al.  PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis version 2.09 , 2001 .

[34]  James Macklin,et al.  Natural History Specimen Digitization: Challenges and Concerns , 2010 .

[35]  Nadja K. Simons,et al.  Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization , 2015, Nature Communications.

[36]  Nadja K. Simons,et al.  Multi-taxa approach shows consistent shifts in arthropod functional traits along grassland land-use intensity gradient. , 2015, Ecology.

[37]  Stuart Anderson,et al.  Towards High-Throughput 3D Insect Capture for Species Discovery and Diagnostics , 2017, 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science).

[38]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Carved Visual Hulls for Image-Based Modeling , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[39]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale , 1998 .

[40]  John La Salle,et al.  Whole-drawer imaging for digital management and curation of a large entomological collection , 2012, ZooKeys.

[41]  L. Lens,et al.  Relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and fitness within and between stressed and unstressed populations of the wolf spider Pirata piraticus , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[42]  M. Heethoff,et al.  A new use for synchrotron X‐ray microtomography: three‐dimensional biomechanical modeling of chelicerate mouthparts and calculation of theoretical bite forces , 2009 .

[43]  Nico Cellinese,et al.  Mass digitization of scientific collections: New opportunities to transform the use of biological specimens and underwrite biodiversity science , 2012, ZooKeys.

[44]  A. Henderson.  Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data , 2002, Brittonia.