Knee Motions During Maximum Flexion in Fixed and Mobile-Bearing Arthroplasties

Full flexion is a critical performance requirement for patients in Asia and the Middle East, and increasingly for patients in Europe and North America who have total knee arthroplasty. There has been considerable work characterizing maximum flexion in terms of clinical, surgical, and preoperative factors, but less in vivo experimental work after rehabilitation. The purpose of the current investigation was to determine whether anteroposterior tibiofemoral translation influenced maximum weightbearing knee flexion in patients with good or excellent clinical and functional outcomes. One hundred twenty-one knees in 93 subjects, including 16 different articular surface designs, were studied using fluoroscopy and shape matching to determine knee kinematics in a weightbearing deep flexion activity. A relatively posterior position of the femur on the tibia was significantly correlated with greater maximum knee flexion. Posterior-stabilized arthroplasties had significantly more posterior femoral position and maximum flexion than posterior cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing arthroplasties, which had more posterior femoral position and greater maximum flexion than mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Posterior bone-implant impingement was observed in 28% of knees. Tibiofemoral motions influence the mechanics of weightbearing deep flexion in well-functioning knee arthroplasties.

[1]  H. Inoue,et al.  Relationship between retention of the posterior cruciate ligament and postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. , 1995, Acta Medica Okayama.

[2]  J. Schmieg THE EFFECT OF POST IMPINGEMENT IN POSTERIOR STABILIZED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS ON FEMORAL ROTATION AND DAMAGED AREA AS DETERMINED FROM ANALYSIS OF RETRIEVED TIBIAL INSERTS , 2001 .

[3]  J B Stiehl,et al.  Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  W J Maloney,et al.  The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  A. Unnanantana Press-fit-condylar total knee replacement: experience in 465 Thai patients. , 1997, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[6]  M. Ritter,et al.  Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. , 1987, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  T D Cooke,et al.  Knee kinematics in-vivo of kneeling in deep flexion examined by bi-planar radiographs. , 1997, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[9]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The American journal of knee surgery.

[10]  M S Hefzy,et al.  Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[12]  S.A. Banks,et al.  Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  S. Yoshino,et al.  Postoperative results of Yoshino total knee prosthesis , 1982, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.

[14]  D. Schurman,et al.  Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  P S Walker,et al.  Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  S. Salm,et al.  Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[17]  I. A. Harvey,et al.  Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  Melinda K Harman,et al.  Mechanism of anterior impingement damage in total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  M. Moon,et al.  Squatting Following Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  R. Scott,et al.  Kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty. Perception and reality. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  Lúcio Honório de Carvalho Júnior,et al.  Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty , 2005 .

[22]  C. Ranawat,et al.  A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  A. Lizaur,et al.  Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  S. Yoshino,et al.  Recovery of full flexion after total knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis – a follow-up study , 1997, International Orthopaedics.

[25]  Analysis of rising from a chair after total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[26]  J. Elting,et al.  Range of Motion in Total Knee Replacement , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  S. Yoshino,et al.  Full flexion after total knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[28]  H. Shoji,et al.  Improved range of motion with the Y/S total knee arthroplasty system. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.