Parameter Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Zero-dimensional Multi-physics Lithium-Sulfur Battery Models

This paper examines the problem of estimating the parameters of a Lithium-Sulfur (LiS) battery from experimental cycling data. LiS batteries are attractive compared to traditional Lithium-Ion batteries, thanks largely to their potential to provide higher energy densities. The literature presents a number of different LiS battery models, with different fidelities and complexities. This includes both higher-fidelity diffusion-reaction models as well as "zero-dimensional" models that neglect diffusion dynamics while capturing the physics of the underlying reduction-oxidation reactions. The paper focuses on zero-dimensional LiS battery models, and develops four such models from the literature, reflecting different choices of which redox reactions to model. There is a growing need for using experimental cycling datasets to both parameterize these models and compare their fidelities. To address this need, we fabricated LiS coin cells and performed charge/discharge cycling tests on these cells. In parallel, we analyzed the sensitivity of simulated LiS battery charge/discharge characteristics to underlying model parameters. Using this sensitivity analysis, we selected a subset of model parameters for identification, and estimated these parameters for all four LiS battery models from cycling data, thereby arriving at a consistent experimental comparison and assessment of these models' respective fidelities.

[1]  Shuru Chen,et al.  Organosulfide-plasticized solid-electrolyte interphase layer enables stable lithium metal anodes for long-cycle lithium-sulfur batteries , 2017, Nature Communications.

[2]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[3]  T. Zhao,et al.  Modeling of lithium-sulfur batteries incorporating the effect of Li2S precipitation , 2016 .

[4]  Stefano Longo,et al.  Multi-temperature state-dependent equivalent circuit discharge model for lithium-sulfur batteries , 2016 .

[5]  Stefano Longo,et al.  Lithium–Sulfur Cell Equivalent Circuit Network Model Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  M. Marinescu,et al.  A zero dimensional model of lithium-sulfur batteries during charge and discharge. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[7]  Stefano Longo,et al.  Lithium–Sulfur Battery State-of-Charge Observability Analysis and Estimation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  M. Marinescu,et al.  Improved state of charge estimation for lithium-sulfur batteries , 2019 .

[9]  Mark Wild,et al.  Lithium sulfur batteries, a mechanistic review , 2015 .

[10]  Wolfgang G. Bessler,et al.  Insight into lithium–sulfur batteries: Elementary kinetic modeling and impedance simulation , 2013 .

[11]  Arumugam Manthiram,et al.  Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[12]  S. E. Mochalov,et al.  A study of the electrochemical processes in lithiumsulphur cells by impedance spectroscopy , 2011 .

[13]  A. Latz,et al.  On the influence of nucleation and growth of S8 and Li2S in lithium-sulfur batteries , 2019, Electrochimica Acta.

[14]  Zhian Zhang,et al.  Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Study of a Lithium/Sulfur Battery: Modeling and Analysis of Capacity Fading , 2013 .

[15]  Rezan Demir‐Cakan Li-S Batteries: The Challenges, Chemistry, Materials, and Future Perspectives , 2017 .

[16]  Bruno Scrosati,et al.  Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries--a review. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[17]  M. Marinescu,et al.  Modeling the voltage loss mechanisms in lithium-sulfur cells: the importance of electrolyte resistance and precipitation kinetics. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[18]  Yuriy V. Mikhaylik,et al.  Polysulfide Shuttle Study in the Li/S Battery System , 2004 .

[19]  Remus Teodorescu,et al.  Electrical circuit models for performance modeling of Lithium-Sulfur batteries , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[20]  Pu Chen,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model of lithium–sulfur cells part I: Applied discharge current and cathode conductivity , 2014 .

[21]  Pu Chen,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model of lithium–sulfur cells: Part II: Precipitation reaction kinetics and sulfur content , 2014 .

[22]  Chao Shen,et al.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of precipitation and solubility effects in lithium-sulfur batteries , 2018, Electrochimica Acta.

[23]  Wolfgang G. Bessler,et al.  Mechanistic modeling of polysulfide shuttle and capacity loss in lithium-sulfur batteries , 2014 .

[24]  Ralph E. White,et al.  A Mathematical Model for a Lithium–Sulfur Cell , 2008 .

[25]  Min-Kyu Song,et al.  Lithium/sulfur batteries with high specific energy: old challenges and new opportunities. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[26]  G. Offer,et al.  Lithium sulfur battery nail penetration test under load , 2015 .

[27]  Pu Chen,et al.  Analysis of a Mathematical Model of Lithium-Sulfur Cells Part III: Electrochemical Reaction Kinetics, Transport Properties and Charging , 2014 .

[28]  M. Marinescu,et al.  Improved state of charge estimation for lithium-sulfur batteries , 2018, Journal of Energy Storage.

[29]  A. Latz,et al.  Modeling of nano-structured cathodes for improved lithium-sulfur batteries , 2015 .

[30]  A. Latz,et al.  Modeling of nanostructured cathodes for improved lithium-sulfur batteries , 2015 .

[31]  Hosam K. Fathy,et al.  On the Accuracy of Drug-Resistant Cell Population Estimation from Total Cancer Size Measurements , 2019, 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC).