This study examined the contribution of classroom learning environment and teaching and learning effectiveness variables to student learning and learning efficacy in higher education settings. It attempted to identify classroom environment characteristics that differentiate highand lowacademic-efficacy student groups and the teaching and learning effectiveness variables that differentiate these groups. Also examined were how these variables differentiate levels of student course evaluations and the emphasis given in class to the development of higher-order thinking skills. Subjects were all students (n=2,190) in 145 classes offered through the evening continuing education program at Louisiana State University during the 1996 fall semester. Students completed the Student Assessment of Teaching and Learning measure and the newly developed Personal Learning Environment Measure and Student Learning Efficacy Assessment. Findings clearly indicated that student academic self-efficacy was more potent in differentiating course and learning outcomes than either students' perceptions of elements of the classroom environment or their views about their personal motivation/involvement in learning and the general quality of teaching. Other findings suggested that the three instruments used were effective in evaluating the quality of teaching and learning environments. The data collection packet is appended. (Contains 51 references.) (DB) ******************************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * ******************************************************************************** 00 Discriminating Student Learning and Efficacy Levels in Higher Education: Contributions (.A of Classroom Environment and Teaching and Learning Effectiveness U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EITCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) kV This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. John K. Rugutt Chad D. Ellett Rita R. Culross Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY John K. Rugutt TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston, Texas January 1998 BEST COPY AVAILABLE 1 Discriminating Student Learning and Efficacy Levels in Higher Education: Contributions of Classroom Environment and Teaching and Learning Effectiveness The quality of undergraduate teaching and learning environments on college/university campuses is a continuing national concern. The recent call to "reaffirm teaching as the university's primary task" (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching) emphasizes the importance of improving undergraduate teaching and learning environments. Traditionally, college teaching and courses have been evaluated through the use of student ratings and reviews of the literature (e.g., Aleamoni, 1987; Centra, 1993) provide considerable support for this procedure, particularly when such information is used for formative evaluation purposes. While important, student ratings of faculty and course characteristics alone are not sufficient to provide a basis for developing theory rich models of teaching and learning in higher education settings. In addition, they provide little basis for broadening our understanding of the complexity of teaching and learning, learning environment characteristics and student-related variables as these contribute to the enhancement of student learning. Development of student assessments of college teaching to include information about the enhancement of student learning has recently been cited as a critical evaluation need in higher education settings (McKeachie & Kaplan,
[1]
P. A. Cohen.
Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies
,
1981
.
[2]
Chad D. Ellett,et al.
The development, validity, and reliability of a faculty evaluation instrument to measure generic teaching skills and perceived enhancement of student learning
,
1988
.
[3]
James S. Clarke.
Faculty Receptivity/Resistance to Change, Personal and Organizational Efficacy, Decision Deprivation and Effectiveness in Research I Universities. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper.
,
1996
.
[4]
Robert P. Steel,et al.
A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984
,
1987
.
[5]
A. Bandura.
Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
,
1977,
Psychology Review.
[6]
D. Treagust,et al.
Validation and Application of the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI).
,
1986
.
[7]
Kathleen M. Quinlan,et al.
The Teaching Portfolio
,
2023
.
[8]
S. Messick.
Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45.
,
1994
.
[9]
Shari L. Peterson,et al.
Effects of Career-Decision-Making Self-Efficacy on the Retention of Underprepared Adults: A Path Analytic Study of Student Persistence.
,
1996
.
[10]
Karen S. Loup,et al.
Measuring and Linking School Professional Learning Environment Characteristics, Teacher Self and Organizational Efficacy, Receptivity to Change, and Multiple Indices of School Effectiveness.
,
1994
.
[11]
Development, Validity and Reliability of a New Generation of Assessments of Effective Teaching and Learning: Future Directions for the Study of Learning Environments.
,
1991
.
[12]
David F. Treagust,et al.
Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges
,
1986
.
[13]
A. Bandura.
Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning
,
1993,
Educational Psychologist.
[14]
S. Simmons.
Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness
,
1996
.
[15]
A. Bandura,et al.
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
,
1983
.
[16]
A. Bandura.
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.
,
1982
.
[17]
Herbert J. Walberg,et al.
Educational environments : evaluation, antecedents and consequences
,
1991
.
[18]
Brian J. Furio.
The relationship between instructor behaviors and student perceptions of control in the classroom
,
1986
.
[19]
B. Fraser,et al.
A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environments as perceived by science teachers and students
,
1983
.
[20]
Frank M. Pajares,et al.
Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings
,
1996
.
[21]
Albert Bandura,et al.
Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies
,
1995
.
[22]
E. A. Locke,et al.
Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980.
,
1981
.
[23]
A. Bandura.
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
,
1986
.
[24]
L. M. Aleamoni.
Student rating myths versus research facts
,
1987
.