Students' Adaptation and Transfer of Strategies across Levels of Scaffolding in an Exploratory Environment

While the effect of scaffolding on learning has received much attention, less is known about its effect on students’ strategy use, especially in transfer activities. This study focuses on students’ adaptive behaviours as a function of given scaffolding and when transitioning from a scaffolded to an unstructured activity. We study this in the context of a complex physics simulation in which students choose between 124 different actions. We evaluate (i) how the scaffolding affects students’ building and testing behaviours, (ii) whether these behaviours transfer to an unstructured activity, and (iii) the relationship between the adapted behaviours and learning. A repeated-measures MANOVA suggests that students adapt their learning behaviours according to the demands and affordances of the task and the environment, and that these strategies transfer from a scaffolded to an unstructured activity. No significant relationships were found between these patterns and learning.

[1]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations , 2010 .

[2]  Cristina Conati,et al.  The Usefulness of Log Based Clustering in a Complex Simulation Environment , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[3]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system , 2011, Learning and Instruction.

[4]  Ido Roll,et al.  Making the failure more productive: scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in invention activities , 2014 .

[5]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[6]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Finding Out How They Find It Out: An empirical analysis of inquiry learners’ need for support , 2010 .

[7]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship? Intelligent Tutoring Systems and MOOCs , 2015, AIED.

[8]  K. Koedinger,et al.  In Vivo Experiments on Whether Supporting Metacognition in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Yields Robust Learning , 2009 .

[9]  Mitchell J. Nathan Knowledge and Situational Feedback in a Learning Environment for Algebra Story Problem Solving , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Leveraging machine-learned detectors of systematic inquiry behavior to estimate and predict transfer of inquiry skill , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[11]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Auto-scoring Discovery and Confirmation Bias in Interpreting Data during Science Inquiry in a Microworld , 2013, AIED.

[12]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Mining Student Behavior Models in Learning-by-Teaching Environments , 2008, EDM.

[13]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning , 2008, Science.