A Generalized Gamma Mixture Model for Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization

Several statistical models have been proposed in the literature to describe the behavior of speckles. Among them, the Nakagami distribution has proven to very accurately characterize the speckle behavior in tissues. However, it fails when describing the heavier tails caused by the impulsive response of a speckle. The Generalized Gamma (GG) distribution (which also generalizes the Nakagami distribution) was proposed to overcome these limitations. Despite the advantages of the distribution in terms of goodness of fitting, its main drawback is the lack of a closed-form maximum likelihood (ML) estimates. Thus, the calculation of its parameters becomes difficult and not attractive. In this work, we propose (1) a simple but robust methodology to estimate the ML parameters of GG distributions and (2) a Generalized Gama Mixture Model (GGMM). These mixture models are of great value in ultrasound imaging when the received signal is characterized by a different nature of tissues. We show that a better speckle characterization is achieved when using GG and GGMM rather than other state-of-the-art distributions and mixture models. Results showed the better performance of the GG distribution in characterizing the speckle of blood and myocardial tissue in ultrasonic images.

[1]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the estimation of the coefficient of variation for anisotropic diffusion speckle filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  P. Shankar.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Livia Kapusta,et al.  Modeling envelope statistics of blood and myocardium for segmentation of echocardiographic images. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Probabilistic-Driven Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion with Application to Cardiac Ultrasonic Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[8]  J. Arendt.  Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[9]  Bush Jones,et al.  Root isolation using function values , 1978 .

[10]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Torbjørn Eltoft,et al.  Modeling the amplitude statistics of ultrasonic images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Rayleigh Mixture Model for Plaque Characterization in Intravascular Ultrasound , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Alain Dussauchoy,et al.  Parameter estimation of the generalized gamma distribution , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[14]  Andrew R. Webb,et al.  Bayesian gamma mixture model approach to radar target recognition , 2003 .

[15]  X. Jin.  Factor graphs and the Sum-Product Algorithm , 2002 .

[16]  George Marsaglia,et al.  A simple method for generating gamma variables , 2000, TOMS.

[17]  Charles Elkan,et al.  Expectation Maximization Algorithm , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[18]  D. Anderson,et al.  Algorithms for minimization without derivatives , 1974 .

[19]  Andrew R. Webb.  Gamma mixture models for target recognition , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Segmentation in Ultrasonic B-Mode Images of Healthy Carotid Arteries Using Mixtures of Nakagami Distributions and Stochastic Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  D. R. Wingo.  Computing Maximum-Likelihood Parameter Estimates of the Generalized Gamma Distribution by Numerical Root Isolation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[22]  Lee J. Bain,et al.  Inferential Procedures for the Generalized Gamma Distribution , 1970 .

[23]  J. Lawless.  Inference in the Generalized Gamma and Log Gamma Distributions , 1980 .

[24]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound echo envelope analysis using a homodyned K distribution signal model. , 1994, Ultrasonic imaging.

[25]  M. El-Sayed Waheed,et al.  Mixture of Generalized Gamma Density-Based Score Function for Fastica , 2011 .

[26]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  Evaluation of Four Probability Distribution Models for Speckle in Clinical Cardiac Ultrasound Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Horst Alzer,et al.  On some inequalities for the gamma and psi functions , 1997, Math. Comput..

[28]  P. Mohana Shankar,et al.  A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[30]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[31]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Reverend Bayes on Inference Engines: A Distributed Hierarchical Approach , 1982, AAAI.

[32]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the influence of interpolation on probabilistic models for ultrasonic images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[33]  A. W. van der Vaart,et al.  Uniform Central Limit Theorems , 2001 .

[34]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[35]  M. C. Jones,et al.  On maximization of the likelihood for the generalized gamma distribution , 2013, Comput. Stat..