Rural and Suburban Sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and Its Relation to Forest Fragmentation

Housing growth and its environmental effects pose major conservation challenges. We sought to (1) quantify spatial and temporal patterns of housing growth across the U.S. Midwest from 1940-2000, (2) identify ecoregions strongly affected by housing growth, (3) assess the extent to which forests occur near housing, and (4) relate housing to forest fragmentation. We used data from the 2000 U.S. Census to derive fine-scale backcasts of decadal housing density. Housing data were integrated with a 30-m resolution U.S. Geological Survey land cover classification. The number of housing units in the Midwest grew by 146% between 1940 and 2000. Spatially, housing growth was particularly strong at the fringe of metropolitan areas (suburban sprawl) and in nonmetropolitan areas (rural sprawl) that are rich in natural amenities such as lakes and forests. The medium-density housing (4-32 housing units/km 2 ) category increased most in area. Temporally, suburban housing growth was especially high in the post-World War II decades. Rural sprawl was highest in the 1970s and 1990s. The majority of midwestern forests either contained or were near housing. Only 14.8% of the region's forests were in partial block groups with no housing. Housing density was negatively correlated with the amount of interior forest. The widespread and pervasive nature of sprawl shown by our data is cause for conservation concern. Suburban sprawl has major environmental impacts on comparatively small areas because of the high number of housing units involved. In contrast, rural sprawl affects larger areas but with less intensity because associated housing densities are lower. The environmental effects per house, however, are likely higher in the case of rural sprawl because it occurs in less-altered areas. Conservation efforts will need to address both types of sprawl to be successful.

[1]  A. Ehrlich,et al.  Human Population Control: The Missing Agenda , 1993 .

[2]  M. Soulé,et al.  Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system , 1999, Nature.

[3]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  Toward a dynamic model of complex tourism choices: the seasonal home location decision. , 1995 .

[4]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Ranching the View: Subdivisions versus Agriculture , 1995 .

[5]  M. Soulé,et al.  Land Use Planning and Wildlife Maintenance: Guidelines for Conserving Wildlife in an Urban Landscape , 1991 .

[6]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  Fragmentation of Continental United States Forests , 2002, Ecosystems.

[7]  John I. Carruthers,et al.  Land Use Planning and Exurbanization in the Rural Mountain West , 2000 .

[8]  J. Wisniewski,et al.  Forest fragmentation : wildlife and management implications , 1999 .

[9]  R. Johnston Synanthropic birds of North America , 2001 .

[10]  Kenneth M. Johnson,et al.  Nonmetro Recreation Counties: Their Identification and Rapid Growth , 2003 .

[11]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[12]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Residential expansion as a continental threat to U.S. coastal ecosystems , 2000 .

[13]  Denis White,et al.  Assessing Risks to Biodiversity from Future Landscape Change , 1997 .

[14]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[15]  J. Cary,et al.  Modeling Dynamics of Habitat‐Interior Bird Populations in Fragmented Landscapes , 1988 .

[16]  G. Daily,et al.  Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[17]  M. Mckinney Effects of human population, area, and time on non-native plant and fish diversity in the United States , 2001 .

[18]  A. Nelson,et al.  The Exurbanization of America and Its Planning Policy Implications , 1990 .

[19]  Incorporating Ecology into Land Use Planning: The Songbirds' Case for Clustered Development , 2003 .

[20]  B. Czech,et al.  Economic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States , 2000 .

[21]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado , 2001 .

[22]  Douglas T. Bolger,et al.  EFFECTS OF FRAGMENTATION AND INVASION ON NATIVE ANT COMMUNITIES IN COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA , 1998 .

[23]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[24]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Roads and Landscape Pattern in Northern Wisconsin Based on a Comparison of Four Road Data Sources , 2004 .

[25]  T. Daniels When City and Country Collide: Managing Growth In The Metropolitan Fringe , 1998 .

[26]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[27]  Therese M. Donovan,et al.  Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds , 1995, Science.

[28]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Conservation Where People Live and Work , 2002 .

[29]  J. Swenson,et al.  The effects of future urban development on habitat fragmentation in the Santa Monica Mountains , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  C. Beale,et al.  Decade of Pessimistic Nonmetro Population Trends Ends on Optimistic Note. , 1990 .

[31]  M. Turner,et al.  Explaining Human Settlement Patterns in a Recreational Lake District: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA , 2002, Environmental management.

[32]  D. Gale Eight State-Sponsored Growth Management Programs: A Comparative Analysis , 1992 .

[33]  W. Myers,et al.  Patterns of mammalian species richness and habitat associations in Pennsylvania , 2001 .

[34]  Andrea Wright Parmenter,et al.  Ecological Causes and Consequences of Demographic Change in the New West , 2002 .

[35]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Characterizing dynamic spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940-1990 across the North Central United States , 2004 .

[36]  J. Marzluff,et al.  Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World , 2002, Springer US.

[37]  Jeremy D. Maestas,et al.  Biodiversity across a Rural Land‐Use Gradient , 2003 .

[38]  Kenneth M. Johnson,et al.  The identification of recreational counties in nonmetropolitan areas of the USA , 1998 .

[39]  G. Fuguitt The nonmetropolitan population turnaround. , 1985, Annual review of sociology.

[40]  John W. Keller,et al.  Rural Planning and Development in the United States , 1989 .

[41]  R. B. Hammer,et al.  Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens , 2001 .

[42]  P. Eagles,et al.  Effects of Residential Development on Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Migrant Songbirds , 1995 .

[43]  N. Thompson Hobbs,et al.  Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat , 1997 .

[44]  H. Mooney,et al.  Broadening the Extinction Debate: Population Deletions and Additions in California and Western Australia , 1998 .

[45]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[46]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  Natural Amenities and Population Growth in the Greater Yellowstone Region , 2000 .

[47]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[48]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Land‐Use Dynamics Beyond the American Urban Fringe* , 2001 .

[49]  L. Broberg Conserving Ecosystems Locally: A Role for Ecologists in Land-Use Planning , 2003 .

[50]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[51]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Placing exurban land‐use change in a human modification framework , 2004 .

[52]  J. Bourdages,et al.  Response Time of Wetland Biodiversity to Road Construction on Adjacent Lands , 2000 .

[53]  J. Swenson,et al.  Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable , 2001 .