Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice, Strategy, and Governance

In 2013 a new collaborative center was established in Wellington, New Zealand to focus on integrating resilience research with the region’s community disaster resilience strategy. An earlier study with parties to this center had indicated that researcher and practitioner groups were divided by attention to their own immediate knowledge and skills, but agreed there was a need to maximize community resilience benefits amongst a regional population. An action research workshop of researchers and practitioners used a visual logic model to focus on the pragmatic benefits of improving community resilience. The visual logic model was used to design research activities that would improve the regional community resilience strategy, which was still in an early implementation phase. Ten of 14 workshop participants were interviewed following the workshop. Statistical content analysis of interview data highlighted certain strengths of the action research process: visual monitoring and evaluation planning was a catalyst for complicated conversations between two very different groups of professionals; and researchers became more focused on practical issues as a result. Other findings suggested that in future collaborative research governance would benefit from wider cycles of strategic intelligence, enhanced research contributions, and the use of different information formats for different purposes. Different formats for different purposes should also be considered when developing and implementing large-scale disaster risk reduction policies and strategies.

[1]  Christopher G. Burton,et al.  The Development of Metrics For Community Resilience to Natural Disasters , 2012 .

[2]  Effects of unreasonable pay discrepancies for under- and overpayment on double demotivation. , 1996, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[3]  Thomas J. Huggins,et al.  Visually Modeling New Zealand Conservation Strategy: A Study of User Experiences , 2012 .

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  Disaster and emergency management systems in urban areas , 2011, Cities.

[6]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[7]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Realism in contemporary organisation and management studies , 2000 .

[8]  Benjamin Brooks,et al.  Developing a research framework for complex multi–team coordination in emergency management , 2013 .

[9]  Andrew B Newsham,et al.  Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the Potentials and Limits of the Concept of Resilience in Relation to Vulnerability Reduction Programmes , 2012 .

[10]  S. Porter,et al.  Critical Realist Ethnography: The Case of Racism and Professionalism in a Medical Setting , 1993 .

[11]  Visually Planning Sustainability Research: A Case Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration , 2014 .

[12]  Mathea Roorda,et al.  Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy , 2009 .

[13]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[14]  David L. Faigman To Have and Have Not: Assessing the Value of Social Science to the Law as Science and Policy , 1989 .

[15]  Pat Ricia,et al.  Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions , 2008 .

[16]  P. Todd,et al.  Bounding rationality to the world , 2003 .

[17]  G. Ryan Critical realist ethnography: from philosophy to the practice of research analysis. , 2017 .

[18]  S. Parkinson,et al.  Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[19]  B. Tversky,et al.  Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[21]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[22]  T. J. Huggins,et al.  Politics of Practical and Academic Knowledge: A Q‐Method Analysis of Gauging Community Disaster Resilience , 2015 .

[23]  Lisa Krizan,et al.  Intelligence Essentials for Everyone , 1999 .

[24]  J. Kampen,et al.  Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology , 2014 .

[25]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Visualizing Thought , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Change management: Time for a change! , 2004 .

[27]  Shamsul Fakhruddin,et al.  UNISDR Science and Technology Conference on the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 , 2016 .

[28]  Gordon McBean,et al.  Integrating disaster risk reduction towards sustainable development , 2012 .

[29]  H. S. Wilson Qualitative Studies: From Observations to Explanations , 1985, The Journal of nursing administration.

[30]  SAGE Research Methods Cases , 2013 .

[31]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Content and thematic analysis , 2003 .