Prediction of transcription factor binding to DNA using rule induction methods
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Gehring,et al. Differential interactions of eyeless and twin of eyeless with the sine oculis enhancer. , 2002, Development.
[2] Carl O. Pabo,et al. A General Strategy for Selecting High-Affinity Zinc Finger Proteins for Diverse DNA Target Sites , 1997, Science.
[3] Trevor Hastie,et al. Gene expression patterns in ovarian carcinomas. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.
[4] S Wold,et al. A multivariate representation and analysis of DNA sequence data. , 1991, Acta chemica Scandinavica.
[5] G. Church,et al. Nucleotides of transcription factor binding sites exert interdependent effects on the binding affinities of transcription factors. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.
[6] A Klug,et al. Selection of DNA binding sites for zinc fingers using rationally randomized DNA reveals coded interactions. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7] A. Kahn,et al. Novel Target Sequences for Pax-6 in the Brain-specific Activating Regions of the Rat Aldolase C Gene* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[8] D. Schmucker,et al. Direct regulation of rhodopsin 1 by Pax-6/eyeless in Drosophila: evidence for a conserved function in photoreceptors. , 1997, Genes & development.
[9] D. Hayward,et al. Pax gene diversity in the basal cnidarian Acropora millepora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa): implications for the evolution of the Pax gene family. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10] M J May,et al. NF-kappa B and Rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.
[11] Claude Desplan,et al. Crystal structure of a paired domain-DNA complex at 2.5 å resolution reveals structural basis for pax developmental mutations , 1995, Cell.
[12] A. Goriely,et al. Lune/eye gone, a Pax-like protein, uses a partial paired domain and a homeodomain for DNA recognition. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[13] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Applications of machine learning and rule induction , 1995, CACM.
[14] R. Lutz,et al. Highly conserved amino acids in Pax and Ets proteins are required for DNA binding and ternary complex assembly. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.
[15] J A Epstein,et al. Two independent and interactive DNA-binding subdomains of the Pax6 paired domain are regulated by alternative splicing. , 1994, Genes & development.
[16] S. Hodgson,et al. The human PAX6 gene is mutated in two patients with aniridia , 1992, Nature Genetics.
[17] M. Busslinger,et al. DNA-binding and transactivation properties of Pax-6: three amino acids in the paired domain are responsible for the different sequence recognition of Pax-6 and BSAP (Pax-5) , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[18] S. Wold,et al. New chemical descriptors relevant for the design of biologically active peptides. A multivariate characterization of 87 amino acids. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Diversity and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance: A bioinformatics approach to predicting phenotype from genotype , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] C. Desplan,et al. Modular Organization of Pax/Homeodomain Proteins in Transcriptional Regulation , 1997, Biological chemistry.
[21] J. Ross Quinlan,et al. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .
[22] P. Gruss,et al. Retinal pigmented epithelium determination requires the redundant activities of Pax2 and Pax6 , 2003, Development.
[23] M Gerstein,et al. DNA recognition code of transcription factors. , 1995, Protein engineering.
[24] C. Garvie,et al. Requirements for selective recruitment of Ets proteins and activation of mb-1/Ig-alpha gene transcription by Pax-5 (BSAP). , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[25] A Klug,et al. Physical basis of a protein-DNA recognition code. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.
[26] Heinz-Theodor Mevissen,et al. Decision tree-based formation of consensus protein secondary structure prediction , 1999, Bioinform..
[27] L. McIntosh,et al. The Highly Conserved β-Hairpin of the Paired DNA-Binding Domain Is Required for Assembly of Pax-Ets Ternary Complexes , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[28] G. Damante,et al. A network of specific minor-groove contacts is a common characteristic of paired-domain-DNA interactions. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.
[29] J R Desjarlais,et al. Toward rules relating zinc finger protein sequences and DNA binding site preferences. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[30] G. Schaffner,et al. DNA sequence recognition by Pax proteins: bipartite structure of the paired domain and its binding site. , 1993, Genes & development.
[31] G. Edelman,et al. A binding site for homeodomain and Pax proteins is necessary for L1 cell adhesion molecule gene expression by Pax-6 and bone morphogenetic proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[32] P. Callaerts,et al. Gene duplication and recruitment of a specific tropomyosin into striated muscle cells in the jellyfish Podocoryne carnea. , 1999, The Journal of experimental zoology.
[33] G. Halder,et al. twin of eyeless, a second Pax-6 gene of Drosophila, acts upstream of eyeless in the control of eye development. , 1999, Molecular cell.
[34] A. Aguzzi,et al. Pax-5 encodes the transcription factor BSAP and is expressed in B lymphocytes, the developing CNS, and adult testis. , 1992, Genes & development.
[35] Panayiotis V Benos,et al. Probabilistic code for DNA recognition by proteins of the EGR family. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[36] K. Vogan,et al. An alternative splicing event in the Pax-3 paired domain identifies the linker region as a key determinant of paired domain DNA-binding activity , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.
[37] K. Catron,et al. Nucleotides flanking a conserved TAAT core dictate the DNA binding specificity of three murine homeodomain proteins , 1993, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[38] J. Epstein,et al. Pax3 modulates expression of the c-Met receptor during limb muscle development. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[39] P. Callaerts,et al. Characterization and expression analysis of an ancestor-type Pax gene in the hydrozoan jellyfish Podocoryne carnea , 2000, Mechanisms of Development.
[40] G. Stormo,et al. Additivity in protein-DNA interactions: how good an approximation is it? , 2002, Nucleic acids research.
[41] Henrik Boström,et al. Covering vs. Divide-and-Conquer for Top-Down Induction of Logic Programs , 1995, IJCAI.
[42] Z. Kozmík,et al. Role of Pax genes in eye evolution: a cnidarian PaxB gene uniting Pax2 and Pax6 functions. , 2003, Developmental cell.
[43] R. Balling,et al. Pax1 and Pax9 activate Bapx1 to induce chondrogenic differentiation in the sclerotome , 2003, Development.
[44] Christoph Adami,et al. Information theory in molecular biology , 2004, q-bio/0405004.
[45] W. Li,et al. Isolation of Cladonema Pax-B genes and studies of the DNA-binding properties of cnidarian Pax paired domains. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.
[46] Panayiotis V Benos,et al. Is there a code for protein-DNA recognition? Probab(ilistical)ly. . . , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[47] T. Friedman,et al. A frameshift mutation in the HuP2 paired domain of the probable human homolog of murine Pax-3 is responsible for Waardenburg syndrome type 1 in an Indonesian family. , 1992, Human molecular genetics.
[48] C. Garvie,et al. Structural studies of Ets-1/Pax5 complex formation on DNA. , 2001, Molecular cell.
[49] M. Goulding,et al. Molecular basis of splotch and Waardenburg Pax-3 mutations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[50] D. Hewett‐Emmett,et al. Evolution of paired domains: isolation and sequencing of jellyfish and hydra Pax genes related to Pax-5 and Pax-6. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[51] G. Chalepakis,et al. Identification of DNA recognition sequences for the Pax3 paired domain. , 1995, Gene.
[52] P. Gros,et al. Reciprocal effect of Waardenburg syndrome mutations on DNA binding by the Pax-3 paired domain and homeodomain. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.
[53] D. Larhammar,et al. Mutational analysis of the Acropora millepora PaxD paired domain highlights the importance of the linker region for DNA binding. , 2003, Gene.
[54] M. Goulding,et al. The molecular basis of the undulated/Pax-1 mutation , 1991, Cell.
[55] Alberto Maria Segre,et al. Programs for Machine Learning , 1994 .
[56] J. Epstein,et al. Identification of a Pax paired domain recognition sequence and evidence for DNA-dependent conformational changes. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[57] J A Epstein,et al. Crystal structure of the human Pax6 paired domain-DNA complex reveals specific roles for the linker region and carboxy-terminal subdomain in DNA binding. , 1999, Genes & development.
[58] J. Epstein,et al. Getting your Pax straight: Pax proteins in development and disease. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[59] W. Gehring,et al. DNA-binding characteristics of cnidarian Pax-C and Pax-B proteins in vivo and in vitro: no simple relationship with the Pax-6 and Pax-2/5/8 classes. , 2003, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.
[60] C. Desplan,et al. Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain. , 1996, Development.
[61] J. Thompson,et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.
[62] G. Edelman,et al. Pax-3 contains domains for transcription activation and transcription inhibition. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[63] V. Beneš,et al. DNA binding and transactivating properties of the paired and homeobox protein Pax4. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[64] K. Vogan,et al. The C-terminal Subdomain Makes an Important Contribution to the DNA Binding Activity of the Pax-3 Paired Domain* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[65] H. Margalit,et al. Quantitative parameters for amino acid-base interaction: implications for prediction of protein-DNA binding sites. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.
[66] A. Scaloni,et al. Redox Potential Controls the Structure and DNA Binding Activity of the Paired Domain* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.