Selection and Combination of Heterogeneous Mappings to Enhance Biomedical Ontology Matching

This paper presents a novel background knowledge approach which selects and combines existing mappings from a given biomedical ontology repository to improve ontology alignment. Current background knowledge approaches usually select either manually or automatically a limited number of different ontologies and use them as a whole for background knowledge. Whereas in our approach, we propose to pick up only relevant concepts and relevant existing mappings linking these concepts all together in a specific and customized background knowledge graph. Paths within this graph will help to discover new mappings. We have implemented and evaluated our approach using the content of the NCBO BioPortal repository and the Anatomy benchmark from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative. We used the mapping gain measure to assess how much our final background knowledge graph improves results of state-of-the-art alignment systems. Furthermore, the evaluation shows that our approach produces a high quality alignment and discovers mappings that have not been found by state-of-the-art systems.

[1]  Catia Pesquita,et al.  Towards Annotating Potential Incoherences in BioPortal Mappings , 2014, SEMWEB.

[2]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The Open Biomedical Annotator , 2009, Summit on translational bioinformatics.

[3]  Valerie V. Cross,et al.  LogMap family results for OAEI 2014 , 2014, OM.

[4]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[6]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  What Four Million Mappings Can Tell You about Two Hundred Ontologies , 2009, SEMWEB.

[7]  Isabel F. Cruz,et al.  Automatic Background Knowledge Selection for Matching Biomedical Ontologies , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Amina Annane,et al.  Multilingual Mapping Reconciliation between English-French Biomedical Ontologies , 2016, WIMS.

[9]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2007 , 2006, OM.

[10]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[11]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative , 2007 .

[12]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Effective Mapping Composition for Biomedical Ontologies , 2012 .

[13]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Exploring the Semantic Web as Background Knowledge for Ontology Matching , 2008, J. Data Semant..

[14]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  Automatic Ontology Matching via Upper Ontologies: A Systematic Evaluation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[15]  Jérôme David,et al.  Context-Based Matching: Design of a Flexible Framework and Experiment , 2014, Journal on Data Semantics.

[16]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Exploiting the structure of background knowledge used , 2006 .

[17]  Valerie V. Cross,et al.  Extending an ontology alignment system with BioPortal: a preliminary analysis , 2014, International Semantic Web Conference.

[18]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Creating Mappings For Ontologies in Biomedicine: Simple Methods Work , 2009, AMIA.

[19]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Mapping Composition for Matching Large Life Science Ontologies , 2011, ICBO.

[20]  Aynaz Taheri,et al.  AML results for OAEI 2015 , 2015, OM.

[21]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Effective Composition of Mappings for Matching Biomedical Ontologies , 2012, ESWC.

[22]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Christoph Quix,et al.  Automatic selection of background knowledge for ontology matching , 2011, SWIM '11.