How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces

It has been shown that children and non-human animals seem to integrate geometric and featural information to different extents in order to reorient themselves in environments of different spatial scales. We trained fish (redtail splitfins, Xenotoca eiseni) to reorient to find a corner in a rectangular tank with a distinctive featural cue (a blue wall). Then we tested fish after displacement of the feature on another adjacent wall. In the large enclosure, fish chose the two corners with the feature, and also tended to choose among them the one that maintained the correct arrangement of the featural cue with respect to geometric sense (i.e. left-right position). In contrast, in the small enclosure, fish chose both the two corners with the features and the corner, without any feature, that maintained the correct metric arrangement of the walls with respect to geometric sense. Possible reasons for species differences in the use of geometric and non-geometric information are discussed.

[1]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[2]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[3]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[4]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  Effects of predation pressure on the cognitive ability of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi , 2005 .

[5]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[7]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[8]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[9]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Conjoining information from different modules: A comparative perspective , 2002 .

[10]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visual Cognition and Representation in Birds and Primates , 2004 .

[11]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[12]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Theresa Burt de Perera,et al.  Spatial parameters encoded in the spatial map of the blind Mexican cave fish, Astyanax fasciatus , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[15]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Dissecting the Geometric Module , 2006, Psychological science.

[16]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Initial knowledge and conceptual change: space and number , 2001 .

[17]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateralization of response to social stimuli in fishes: A comparison between different methods and species , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[19]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  E S Spelke,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[21]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: evidence for geometric and non-geometric features , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[22]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[23]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[24]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[25]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Roots of brain specializations: preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Lesley J. Rogers,et al.  Comparative vertebrate cognition : are primates superior to non-primates? , 2004 .

[29]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module , 2005 .

[30]  M. Shatz Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (review) , 2006 .

[31]  S. Levinson,et al.  Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development , 2001 .

[32]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language , 2003 .

[33]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.