Energetics of the presequence-binding poses in mitochondrial protein import through Tom20.

Tom20 is located at the outer membrane of mitochondria and functions as a receptor for the N-terminal presequence of mitochondrial-precursor proteins. Recently, three atomic structures of the Tom20-presequence complex were determined using X-ray crystallography and classified into A-, M-, and Y-poses in terms of their presequence-binding modes. Combined with biochemical and NMR data, a dynamic-equilibrium model between the three poses has been proposed. To investigate this mechanism in further detail, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and replica-exchange MD (REMD) simulations of the Tom20-presequence complex in explicit water. In the REMD simulations, one major distribution and another minor one were observed in the converged free-energy landscape at 300 K. In the major distribution, structures similar to A- and M-poses exist, whereas those similar to Y-pose are located in the minor one, suggesting that A-pose in solution is more stable than Y-pose. A k-means clustering algorithm revealed a new pose not yet obtained by X-ray crystallography. This structure has double salt bridges between Arg14' in the presequence and Glu78 or Glu79 in Tom20 and can explain the binding affinity of the complex in previous pull-down assay experiments. Structural clustering and analyses of contacts between Tom20 and the presequence suggest smooth conformational changes from Y- to A-poses through low activation barriers. M-pose lies between Y- and A-poses as a metastable state. The REMD simulations thus provide insights into the energetics of the multiple-binding forms and help to detail the progressive conformational states in the dynamic-equilibrium model based on the experimental data.

[1]  D. Kohda,et al.  Peptide library approach with a disulfide tether to refine the Tom20 recognition motif in mitochondrial presequences. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[4]  T. Lithgow,et al.  Importing Mitochondrial Proteins: Machineries and Mechanisms , 2009, Cell.

[5]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Revisiting the finite temperature string method for the calculation of reaction tubes and free energies. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  E. Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  On-the-fly string method for minimum free energy paths calculation , 2007 .

[7]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[8]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  A temperature predictor for parallel tempering simulations. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[10]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[11]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  G. Heijne The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans‐membrane topology , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  The effects of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of protein: normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulations of melittin in water and in vacuum , 1991 .

[15]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[16]  Alan M. Ferrenberg,et al.  New Monte Carlo technique for studying phase transitions. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[17]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[18]  D. Kohda,et al.  Tom20 recognizes mitochondrial presequences through dynamic equilibrium among multiple bound states , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[19]  K. Dietmeier,et al.  Tom40 forms the hydrophilic channel of the mitochondrial import pore for preproteins , 1998, Nature.

[20]  K. Dill,et al.  Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[22]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  String method in collective variables: minimum free energy paths and isocommittor surfaces. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Michael Feig,et al.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[24]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[25]  F. Noé,et al.  Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational change in macromolecules. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Regulation of the protein-conducting channel by a bound ribosome. , 2009, Structure.

[27]  K. Hukushima,et al.  Exchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations , 1995, cond-mat/9512035.

[28]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[29]  D. Kohda,et al.  NMR identification of the Tom20 binding segment in mitochondrial presequences. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Kyle A. Beauchamp,et al.  Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39). , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  D. Kohda,et al.  Crystallographic snapshots of Tom20-mitochondrial presequence interactions with disulfide-stabilized peptides. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[32]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[33]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[34]  D. Kohda,et al.  Structural Basis of Presequence Recognition by the Mitochondrial Protein Import Receptor Tom20 , 2000, Cell.

[35]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[36]  John D. Chodera,et al.  Long-Time Protein Folding Dynamics from Short-Time Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[37]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[38]  Alan M. Ferrenberg,et al.  Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. , 1989, Physical Review Letters.

[39]  W. E,et al.  Finite temperature string method for the study of rare events. , 2002, Journal of Physical Chemistry B.