Gender Differences in Motivation and Strategy Use in Science: Are Girls Rote Learners?.

This study explored Ridley and Novak's (1983) hypothesis that gender differences in science achievement are due to differences in rote and meaningful learning modes. To test this hypothesis, we examined gender differences in fifth- and sixth-grade students' (N = 213) self-reports of confidence, motivation goals (task mastery, ego, and work avoidance), and learning strategies (active and superficial) in whole-class and small-group science lessons. Overall, the results revealed few gender differences. Compared with girls, boys reported greater confidence in their science abilities. Average-achieving girls reported greater use of meaningful learning strategies than did their male counterparts, whereas low-ability boys reported a stronger mastery orientation than did low-ability girls. The results further showed that students report greater confidence and mastery motivation in small-group than whole-class lessons. In contrast, students reported greater work avoidance in whole-class than small-group lessons. In general, the findings provide little support for Ridley and Novak's hypothesis that girls tend to engage in rote-level learning in science classes. Differences in self-reports of motivation and strategy-use patterns were more strongly related to the student's ability level and to the structure of learning activities (small group vs. whole class) than to gender. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[2]  E. Fennema,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors , 1977 .

[3]  R. Slavin,et al.  Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT): Review of Ten Classroom Experiments. , 1978 .

[4]  R. Straton,et al.  The Development of a Co-Operative, Competitive, and Individualised Learning Preference Scale for Students. , 1980 .

[5]  Joel M. Hoffman,et al.  Children's Achievement-Related Expectancies as a Function of Academic Performance Histories and Sex. , 1980 .

[6]  S. Harter.  A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. , 1981 .

[7]  J. Eccles.  Expectancies, values and academic behaviors , 1983 .

[8]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Sex Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attributions: Influence of Performance Feedback , 1984 .

[9]  Martin L. Maehr,et al.  Gender Differences in Motivational Orientations Toward Achievement in School Science: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1984 .

[10]  J. Nicholls.  Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. , 1984 .

[11]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children's achievement orientations with skill area. , 1984 .

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set , 1984 .

[13]  Susan Bobbitt Nolen,et al.  Adolescents' theories of education. , 1985 .

[14]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Effective Teaching, Student Engagement in Classroom Activities, and Sex-Related Differences in Learning Mathematics , 1985 .

[15]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematics , 1985 .

[16]  Alison Kelly,et al.  The Construction of Masculine Science , 1985 .

[17]  S. B. Nolen,et al.  Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. , 1988 .

[18]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[19]  J. Meece,et al.  Task Factors, Teacher Behavior, and Students' Involvement and Use of Learning Strategies in Science , 1988, The Elementary School Journal.

[20]  S. Stader,et al.  Children's Achievement-Related Beliefs: Effects of Academic Area, Sex, and Achievement Level. , 1989 .

[21]  M. Kimball.  A new perspective on women's math achievement. , 1989 .

[22]  Thomas M. Haladyna,et al.  Motivation and studying in high school science , 1990 .

[23]  J. Steve Oliver,et al.  A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students , 1990 .

[24]  J. Novak,et al.  A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning , 1991 .

[25]  G. Jones.  Gender Differences in Science Competitions. , 1991 .

[26]  Sandra Graham,et al.  Motivational influences on cognition : task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing , 1991 .

[27]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[28]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[29]  Kathleen Holt,et al.  A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals. , 1993 .

[30]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.