The sounds of safety: stress and danger in music perception

As with any sensory input, music might be expected to incorporate the processing of information about the safety of the environment. Little research has been done on how such processing has evolved and how different kinds of sounds may affect the experience of certain environments. In this article, we investigate if music, as a form of auditory information, can trigger the experience of safety. We hypothesized that (1) there should be an optimal, subjectively preferred degree of information density of musical sounds, at which safety-related information can be processed optimally; (2) any deviation from the optimum, that is, both higher and lower levels of information density, should elicit experiences of higher stress and danger; and (3) in general, sonic scenarios with music should reduce experiences of stress and danger more than other scenarios. In Experiment 1, the information density of short music-like rhythmic stimuli was manipulated via their tempo. In an initial session, listeners adjusted the tempo of the stimuli to what they deemed an appropriate tempo. In an ensuing session, the same listeners judged their experienced stress and danger in response to the same stimuli, as well as stimuli exhibiting tempo variants. Results are consistent with the existence of an optimum information density for a given rhythm; the preferred tempo decreased for increasingly complex rhythms. The hypothesis that any deviation from the optimum would lead to experiences of higher stress and danger was only partly fit by the data. In Experiment 2, listeners should indicate their experience of stress and danger in response to different sonic scenarios: music, natural sounds, and silence. As expected, the music scenarios were associated with lowest stress and danger whereas both natural sounds and silence resulted in higher stress and danger. Overall, the results largely fit the hypothesis that music seemingly carries safety-related information about the environment.

[1]  Justyna Humięcka-Jakubowska,et al.  Sweet Anticipation : Music and , 2006 .

[2]  Paul J. Whalen,et al.  The uncertainty of it all , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  E. Capitani,et al.  Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls , 1996, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach , 1999 .

[5]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[6]  Erich Seifritz,et al.  Looming sounds as warning signals: the function of motion cues. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Richard J. Colwell Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward An Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation , 1975 .

[8]  A. Gevins,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of component processes in human working memory. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Anna-Karin Weivert,et al.  Music and Emotion , 2022 .

[10]  N. Anderson PRIMACY EFFECTS IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION USING A GENERALIZED ORDER EFFECT PARADIGM. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Andrew Mathews,et al.  Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. , 2010, Clinical psychology review.

[12]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[13]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain , 2002, Current Biology.

[14]  Ronald G. Heyduk Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency , 1975 .

[15]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[16]  L D Rosenblum,et al.  Auditory looming perception: influences on anticipatory judgments. , 1992, Perception.

[17]  A. Lüthi,et al.  Processing of Temporal Unpredictability in Human and Animal Amygdala , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  E. Holmes,et al.  Mental imagery and emotion: a special relationship? , 2005, Emotion.

[19]  James J. Kellaris Consumer Esthetics Outside the Lab: Preliminary Report on a Musical Field Study , 1992 .

[20]  Satoshi Kanazawa,et al.  Why More Intelligent Individuals Like Classical Music , 2012 .

[21]  M. Pearce,et al.  Sweet Anticipation : Music and the Psychology of Expectation , 2007 .

[22]  J. Weiss,et al.  Somatic Effects of Predictable and Unpredictable Shock , 1970, Psychosomatic medicine.

[23]  Stefano Puglisi-Allegra,et al.  Predictable stress promotes place preference and low mesoaccumbens dopamine response , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[24]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis , 1984, Cognition.

[25]  D H Barlow,et al.  The development of anxiety: the role of control in the early environment. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  J Edworthy,et al.  Improving Auditory Warning Design: Relationship between Warning Sound Parameters and Perceived Urgency , 1991, Human factors.

[27]  Lawrence D. Rosenblum,et al.  Auditory Looming Perception: Influences on Anticipatory Judgments , 1993 .

[28]  A. King,et al.  Neuroscience: The ears have it , 2012, Nature.

[29]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[30]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[31]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .