Convergence and regulation of multi-screen television: The Singapore experience

This article addresses complicated convergent and regulatory issues arising from cross-platform audiovisual services and analyzes Singapore's multi-screen television experience. A ''platform neutrality'' multi-screen TV regulatory scheme is proposed to concentrate on content classification in order to respond to the fast-changing audiovisual industry and competition. Under the scheme, different content and license regulations are applied to four types of TV-like services which are categorized by ''socio-cultural impact'' (i.e., broadcasting and mass market vs. VOD and niche market)'' and ''content production/aggregation model'' (i.e., gatekeeping vs. participatory mechanism). In addition, competition, content regulation, and digital copyright are identified as key issues involved in the fast-growing cross-platform audiovisual media industry. Finally, this study analyzes market development, regulatory issues, and national plans for multi-screen TV services in Singapore and examines them under the proposed regulatory scheme. Market and policy recommendations are discussed.

[1]  Glenda Lawrence,et al.  The Audiovisual Media Services Directive , 2014, E-Commerce and Convergence: A Guide to the Law of Digital Media.

[2]  O. Baumann,et al.  Complexity in the Telecommunications Industry: When Integrating Infrastructure and Services Backfires , 2011 .

[4]  R. Samarajiva,et al.  The next step for telecom regulation : ICT convergence regulation or multisector utilities regulation? , 2002 .

[5]  T. Flew The Convergent Media Policy Moment , 2012 .

[6]  Yu-li Liu,et al.  The development of mobile broadcasting TV: a socio-technical comparison of Singapore and Taiwan , 2011 .

[7]  Neal Geach The future of copyright in the age of convergence: Is a new approach needed for the new media world? , 2009 .

[8]  Paul Ganley Copyright and IPTV , 2007, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[9]  Daeho Kim New regulatory institution for the convergence of broadcasting and telecommunications: A Korean case , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  K. Sarikakis,et al.  Media Policy and Globalization , 2006 .

[12]  Peter Curwen,et al.  Mobile television: technological and regulatory issues , 2008 .

[13]  Anders Henten,et al.  IPTV regulation: Challenges of the new era , 2007 .

[14]  T. Storsul,et al.  The Impact of Convergence on European Television Policy , 2007 .

[15]  Jonathan Cave,et al.  Responding to Convergence: Different Approaches for Telecommunication Regulators , 2008 .

[16]  Krishna P. Jayakar,et al.  The evolution of telecommunications policy-making: Comparative analysis of China and India , 2012 .

[17]  Sylvia Mercado-Kierkegaard The new media landscape: Regulating the idiot boxes , 2006 .