Defining and Measuring Scientific Misinformation

We define scientific misinformation as publicly available information that is misleading or deceptive relative to the best available scientific evidence and that runs contrary to statements by actors or institutions who adhere to scientific principles. Scientific misinformation violates the supposition that claims should be based on scientific evidence and relevant expertise. As such, misinformation is observable and measurable, but research on scientific misinformation to date has often missed opportunities to clearly articulate units of analysis, to consult with experts, and to look beyond convenient sources of misinformation such as social media content. We outline the ways in which scientific misinformation can be thought of as a disorder of public science, identify its specific types and the ways in which it can be measured, and argue that researchers and public actors should do more to connect measurements of misinformation with measurements of effect.

[1]  Amie C O'Donoghue,et al.  An Empirical Procedure to Evaluate Misinformation Rejection and Deception in Mediated Communication Contexts , 2021, Communication Theory.

[2]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Misinformation in and about science , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Michael F. Dahlstrom The narrative truth about scientific misinformation , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Chung-hong Chan,et al.  A cross-national diagnosis of infodemics: comparing the topical and temporal features of misinformation around COVID-19 in China, India, the US, Germany and France , 2021, Online Inf. Rev..

[5]  Andy J. King,et al.  Advancing Visual Health Communication Research to Improve Infodemic Response , 2020, Health communication.

[6]  Felix M. Simon,et al.  Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation , 2020, The international journal of press/politics.

[7]  Amie C O'Donoghue,et al.  Experimental evidence of consumer and physician detection and rejection of misleading prescription drug website content. , 2020, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[8]  Nicole H. O’Donnell,et al.  (S)pin the flu vaccine: Recipes for concern. , 2020, Vaccine.

[9]  Niels G. Mede,et al.  Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science , 2020, Public understanding of science.

[10]  L. Bode,et al.  Defining Misinformation and Understanding its Bounded Nature: Using Expertise and Evidence for Describing Misinformation , 2020, Political Communication.

[11]  V. Suárez-Lledó,et al.  Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Naomi Oreskes,et al.  Why Trust Science? , 2019, Why Trust Science?.

[13]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[14]  Dan Mercea,et al.  The disinformation landscape and the lockdown of social platforms , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[15]  Emily B. Peterson,et al.  Misinformation as a Misunderstood Challenge to Public Health. , 2019, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  Jaime Snyder,et al.  FIVE Dimensions of Visual Misinformation in the Emerging Media Landscape , 2018, Misinformation and Mass Audiences.

[17]  J. Brennen,et al.  Magnetologists on the Beat: The Epistemology of Science Journalism Reconsidered , 2018 .

[18]  J. L. Nelson Misinformation and Mass Audiences , 2018, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.

[19]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[20]  J. Cook,et al.  Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors , 2018 .

[21]  Amie C O'Donoghue,et al.  Awareness of misinformation in health-related advertising: A narrative review of the literature , 2018 .

[22]  Laura Sheble,et al.  Misinformation and Mass Audiences , 2018 .

[23]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era , 2017 .

[24]  Gernot Wagner,et al.  Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media , 2017, Palgrave Communications.

[25]  Douglas J. Rupert,et al.  Correction of misleading information in prescription drug television advertising: The roles of advertisement similarity and time delay , 2017, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[26]  K. Ferdinand,et al.  Zika virus pandemic—analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform , 2017, American journal of infection control.

[27]  Amie C O'Donoghue,et al.  Awareness of FDA's bad ad program and education regarding pharmaceutical advertising: A national survey of prescribers in ambulatory care settings , 2015 .

[28]  Mikkel Gerken The Epistemic Norms of Intra-Scientific Testimony , 2015 .

[29]  Christopher E. Clarke,et al.  The Power of a Picture: Overcoming Scientific Misinformation by Communicating Weight‐of‐Evidence Information with Visual Exemplars , 2015 .

[30]  Amie C O'Donoghue,et al.  Awareness of the Food and Drug Administration's Bad Ad Program and Education Regarding Pharmaceutical Advertising: A National Survey of Prescribers in Ambulatory Care Settings , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[31]  Oded Nov,et al.  How Deceptive are Deceptive Visualizations?: An Empirical Analysis of Common Distortion Techniques , 2015, CHI.

[32]  D. Lindenmayer Merchants of Doubt. How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming , 2012 .

[33]  J. Cook,et al.  Climate Change Denial , 2011 .

[34]  John Cook,et al.  Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand , 2011 .

[35]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[36]  Richard Milne,et al.  Sceptics and deniers of climate change not to be confused , 2010, Nature.

[37]  A. Kata A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. , 2010, Vaccine.

[38]  Martin McKee,et al.  Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond? , 2008, European journal of public health.

[39]  L. G. Doak,et al.  The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[40]  A. Goldman Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[41]  Paul Messaris,et al.  Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising , 1996 .

[42]  K. Krippendorff The Past of Communication's Hoped-For Future. , 1993 .

[43]  Thomas E. Obremski,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1984 .

[44]  F. Turner Public Science in Britain, 1880-1919 , 1980, Isis.

[45]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective , 2006, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[46]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Cynicism and Social Trust in the New Media Environment , 2002 .

[47]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[48]  L. Fleck Scientific Observation and Perception in General [1935] , 1986 .