Medical and Veterinary Students' Structural Knowledge of Pulmonary Physiology Concepts

Purpose The goal of this study was to assess quantitatively medical and veterinary students' knowledge structures of 12 pulmonary physiology concepts before and after receiving a focused instructional block. The “goodness of fit” and internal consistency reliability of the students' knowledge structures were evaluated. Indexes of the students' structural knowledge were correlated with customary measures of student learning of the same concepts. Method Knowledge structures were assessed using a questionnaire that requested similarity judgments about all possible pairs of the concepts: n(n − 1)/2 = 66 pairs. The similarity judgment data were analyzed using the individual differences (INDSCAL) model of multidimensional scaling (MDS). Dimension weights for individual students were then correlated with their final examination scores. Results A four-dimensional MDS solution provided the best structural fit to the pairwise concept-similarity data. Dimension 1 ranges from control of breathing to lung gas exchange. Dimension 2 ranges from control of breathing to respiratory mechanics. Dimension 3 separates perfusion from diffusion. Dimension 4 addresses ventilatory control. Hierarchical concept clusters are located within this framework. However, indexes of structural learning did not correlate with other measures of knowledge about the same concepts. Conclusion The study outcomes, in contrast to research in other fields, suggest that structural knowledge in this domain differs from knowledge assessed by standard examinations. Further research involving other basic science or clinical concept sets is needed to verify or refute this finding.

[1]  Katherine M. Edmondson,et al.  Concept Mapping to Facilitate Veterinary Students' Understanding of Fluid and Electrolyte Disorders , 1998 .

[2]  P. Harasym,et al.  The Structure of Medical Knowledge Reflected in Clinicians’ Estimates of the Probabilities of Signs/Symptoms within Diseases , 1997 .

[3]  H I Modell,et al.  Preparing students to participate in an active learning environment. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  W C McGaghie,et al.  Learning pulmonary physiology: comparison of student and faculty knowledge structures , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  G Bordage,et al.  Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  W C McGaghie,et al.  Agreement among medical experts about the structure of concepts in pulmonary physiology , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  Timothy E. Goldsmith,et al.  Structural knowledge assessment: comparison of referent structures , 1994 .

[8]  K. Edmondson,et al.  Concept maps and the development of cases for problem‐based learning [published erratum appears in Acad Med 1994 Mar;69(3):193] , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  José J. Cañas,et al.  Structural Representations in Knowledge Acquisition. , 1994 .

[10]  V L Patel,et al.  Hypothesis Generation and the Coordination of Theory and Evidence in Novice Diagnostic Reasoning , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  L. Housner,et al.  Pedagogical knowledge structures in prospective teachers: relationships to performance in a teaching methodology course. , 1993, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[12]  Gideon Keren,et al.  A Handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences : methodological issues , 1993 .

[13]  C. Eden.  ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[14]  R H Stevens,et al.  Search path mapping: a versatile approach for visualizing problem-solving behavior. , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  Carol Briscoe,et al.  Meaningful Learning in College Biology through Concept Mapping. , 1991 .

[16]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing Structural Knowledge. , 1991 .

[17]  K. Ericsson,et al.  Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: an introduction , 1991 .

[18]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[19]  Thomas E. Rudy,et al.  Recovering Social-Cognitive Schemata: Descriptions and Applications of Multidimensional Scaling for Clinical Research , 1984 .

[20]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1981 .

[21]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics , 1980 .

[22]  Judith S Reitman,et al.  Organization revealed by recall orders and confirmed by pauses , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  K. R. Hammond.  Human judgment and social policy , 1980 .

[24]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Thought , 1979 .

[25]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling of Concept Learning in an Introductory Course. , 1974 .