Preserved visual language identification despite severe alexia

Patients with letter-by-letter alexia may have residual access to lexical or semantic representations of words despite severely impaired overt word recognition (reading). Here, we report a multilingual patient with severe letter-by-letter alexia who rapidly identified the language of written words and sentences in French and English while he had great difficulty in reading them, judging their lexical status or extracting semantic information. Lexical decision was strongly influenced by the orthographic structure of stimuli: whereas he easily determined the lexical status of illegal nonwords (e.g., 'rsdo'), he had random performance with legal pseudowords (e.g., 'binus'). When asked to determine the language of meaningless letter trigrams with high frequency in the English or French orthography (e.g., 'oth' or 'iqu') his performance was significantly above chance. In contrast, similarly to healthy participants his language decision was at chance with low-frequency trigrams. These findings suggest that written language identification relies on sublexical processing of orthographic rules specific to each language.

[1]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Word or Word-like? Dissociating Orthographic Typicality from Lexicality in the Left Occipito-temporal Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Pennington,et al.  Discourse Processing in Women with Fragile X Syndrome: Evidence for a Deficit Establishing Coherence , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  A. Damasio,et al.  The anatomic basis of pure alexia , 1983, Neurology.

[4]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language and calculation within the parietal lobe: a combined cognitive, anatomical and fMRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision , 2002, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[8]  H. Coslett,et al.  IMPLICIT VS. LETTER-BY-LETTER READING IN PURE ALEXIA: A TALE OF TWO SYSTEMS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  Jean-François Démonet,et al.  Intra-operative mapping of cortical areas involved in reading in mono- and bilingual patients. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  H. Coslett,et al.  Evidence for preserved reading in 'pure alexia'. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Plaut,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Anne Hesketh,et al.  Implicit recognition in pure alexia: The Saffran effect—a tale of two systems or two procedures? , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  Iconic reading in a case of alexia without agraphia caused by a brain tumor: A tachistoscopic study , 1980, Brain and Language.

[17]  Timothy T. Rogers,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION: THE IMPACT OF SEMANTIC IMPAIRMENT ON LEXICAL AND OBJECT DECISION , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Pure Alexia as a Visual Impairment: A Reconsideration , 1991 .

[19]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Martin Arguin,et al.  Parallel processing blocked by letter similarity in letter by letter dyslexia: A replication , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA) , 1996 .

[22]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Early ERP effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition , 2005 .

[23]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter Reading: Psychological Descriptions of a Neurologial Syndrome , 1982 .

[24]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[25]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Reading in pure alexiaThe effect of strategy , 1993 .

[26]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[28]  B. Rapp The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined , 1992 .

[29]  T. Shallice,et al.  Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[31]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  [Q:] When Would You Prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP Correlates of Orthographic Typicality and Lexicality in Written Word Recognition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  A P Leff,et al.  The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Early Event-related Potential Effects of Syllabic Processing during Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure , 2006, NeuroImage.

[35]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.