The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese

The present study examined the processing of the Mandarin Chinese long-distance reflexive ziji to evaluate the role that syntactic structure plays in the memory retrieval operations that support sentence comprehension. Using the multiple-response speed-accuracy tradeoff (MR-SAT) paradigm, we measured the speed with which comprehenders retrieve an antecedent for ziji. Our experimental materials contrasted sentences where ziji's antecedent was in the local clause with sentences where ziji's antecedent was in a distant clause. Time course results from MR-SAT suggest that ziji dependencies with syntactically distant antecedents are slower to process than syntactically local dependencies. To aid in interpreting the SAT data, we present a formal model of the antecedent retrieval process, and derive quantitative predictions about the time course of antecedent retrieval. The modeling results support the Local Search hypothesis: during syntactic retrieval, comprehenders initially limit memory search to the local syntactic domain. We argue that Local Search hypothesis has important implications for theories of locality effects in sentence comprehension. In particular, our results suggest that not all locality effects may be reduced to the effects of temporal decay and retrieval interference.

[1]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Comparing time-accuracy curves: Beyond goodness-of-fit measures , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Wallace L. Chafe,et al.  Language and Consciousness. , 1974 .

[4]  Colin Phillips,et al.  The structure sensitivity of memory access: ERP evidence , 2010 .

[5]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Structural and semantic constraints on the resolution of pronouns and reflexives , 2009, Cognition.

[6]  Matthew W. Wagers,et al.  Experimental Syntax and Island Effects: Memory mechanisms for wh -dependency formation and their implications for islandhood , 2013 .

[7]  S. Freytag Knowledge Of Language Its Nature Origin And Use , 2016 .

[8]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence , 2013 .

[9]  B. Dosher Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  M. Pickering,et al.  Search Strategies in Syntactic Reanalysis , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  B. McElree,et al.  Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. , 1998 .

[13]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[14]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing Negative Polarity Items: When Negation Comes Through the Backdoor , 2005 .

[15]  Brian McElree,et al.  Proactive Interference Slows Recognition by Eliminating Fast Assessments of Familiarity. , 2007 .

[16]  David Swinney,et al.  The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora , 2008 .

[17]  B. McElree,et al.  The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .

[18]  R. Jarvella Effects of syntax on running memory span d for connected discourse , 1970 .

[19]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[20]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[22]  C. T. James Huang,et al.  Logophoricity, attitudes, and Ziji at the interface , 2000 .

[23]  John E. Dennis,et al.  An Adaptive Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm , 1977, TOMS.

[24]  D. Buring,et al.  BINDING THEORY , 2003 .

[25]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition , 1986 .

[27]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[28]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[29]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  M. B. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[32]  G. Hickok,et al.  Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism , 1996, Cognition.

[33]  P. Gordon,et al.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[35]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[36]  Wing-YeeChow,et al.  The structure-sensitivity of memory access: Evidencefrom Mandarin Chinese , 2014 .

[37]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[38]  Colin Phillips,et al.  SELECTIVE FALLIBILITY IN REAL-TIME LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION , 2011 .

[39]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[40]  Marga Reis,et al.  Linguistic evidence : empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives , 2005 .

[41]  Noam Chomsky Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[42]  B. McElree,et al.  Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  J. A. Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007 .

[44]  J. V. Van Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[46]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[47]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension , 1999 .

[48]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Daniel Büring,et al.  Binding Theory by Daniel Büring , 2005 .

[51]  J. Kimball Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[52]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Common time-course and failure of segregation , 1991 .

[53]  Colin Phillips,et al.  5: Grammatical Illusions and Selective Fallibility in Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2011 .

[54]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Importance of Proving the Null , 2022 .

[55]  M. Pickering,et al.  Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing , 1999 .

[56]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Relation between Syntactic and Perceptual Units in Speech Processing , 1970 .

[58]  Y.-H. Audrey Li,et al.  The Syntax of Chinese , 2009 .

[59]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[60]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[61]  James Chandler Subroutine STEPIT-finds local minimum of a smooth function of several parameters , 1969 .

[62]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[63]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[64]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  B. McElree,et al.  Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[66]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[67]  C. Phillips,et al.  Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence , 2009, Brain and Language.

[68]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[69]  Sam Featherston,et al.  Empirical approaches to linguistic theory : studies in meaning and structure , 2012 .

[70]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[71]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[72]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension , 2010, Brain Research.

[73]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[74]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[75]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser , 1989 .

[76]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[77]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[78]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[79]  Zhong Chen,et al.  How structure-sensitive is the parser? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2012 .

[80]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[81]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[82]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[83]  Richard L. Lewis Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[84]  Illusory licensing across dependency types: ERP evidence , 2009 .

[85]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[86]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[87]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence Reanalysis, and Visibility , 1998 .

[88]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[89]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[90]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[91]  Stephanie W. Haas Construal , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[92]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  A new perspective on chinese ziji , 1994 .