Electronic institutions for B2B: dynamic normative environments

The regulation of the activity of multiple autonomous entities represented in a multi-agent system, in environments with no central design (and thus with no cooperative assumption), is gaining much attention in the research community. Approaches to this concern include the use of norms in so-called normative multi-agent systems and the development of electronic institution frameworks. In this paper we describe our approach towards the development of an electronic institution providing an enforceable normative environment. Within this environment, institutional services are provided that assist agents in forming cooperative structures whose commitments are made explicit through contracts. Our normative framework borrows some concepts from contract law theory. Contracts are formalized using norms which are used by the institution while monitoring agents’ activities, thus making our normative environment dynamic. We regard the electronic institution as a means to facilitate both the creation and the enforcement of contracts between agents. A model of “institutional reality” is presented that allows for monitoring the fulfillment of norms. The paper also distinguishes our approach from other developments of the electronic institution concept. We address the application of our proposal in the B2B field, namely regarding the formation of Virtual Organizations.

[1]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Environment Engineering for Multiagent Systems , 2004 .

[2]  Eugénio C. Oliveira,et al.  Virtual Enterprise Normative Framework Within Electronic Institutions , 2004, ESAW.

[3]  Mathias Sallé,et al.  Electronic Contract Framework for Contractual Agents , 2002, Canadian Conference on AI.

[4]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Agent Communication and Institutional Reality , 2004, AC.

[5]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Agents Advanced Features for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce and Virtual Organisations Formation Processes , 2001, AgentLink.

[6]  Guido Boella,et al.  Regulative and Constitutive Norms in Normative Multiagent Systems , 2004, KR.

[7]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Institutional Services for Dynamic Virtual Organizations , 2005, PRO-VE.

[8]  Michael Luck,et al.  Modelling norms for autonomous agents , 2003, Proceedings of the Fourth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, 2003. ENC 2003..

[9]  F. Dignum,et al.  Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: The European AgentLink Perspective , 2001 .

[10]  Marc Esteva,et al.  Environment Engineering for , 2004 .

[11]  Martin J. Kollingbaum,et al.  Supervised interaction: creating a web of trust for contracting agents in electronic environments , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[12]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Animated specifications of computational societies , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[13]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Implementing norms in electronic institutions , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[14]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Formal Specification of Interaction in Agent Societies , 2002, FAABS.

[15]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Engineering Social Order , 2000, ESAW.

[16]  Javier Vázquez-Salceda,et al.  Implementing Norms in Multiagent Systems , 2004, MATES.

[17]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Engineering Societies in the Agents World , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Guido Boella,et al.  Introduction to normative multiagent systems , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[19]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties , 2002 .

[20]  Olga Pacheco,et al.  A Role Based Model for the Normative Specification of Organized Collective Agency and Agents Interaction , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[21]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Towards an Agent-based Infrastructure to Support Virtual Organisations , 2002, PRO-VE.

[22]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  An analysis of agent speech acts as institutional actions , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[23]  Julian Padget,et al.  Formalizing a Language for Institutions and Norms , 2001, ATAL.

[24]  John R. Searle,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1970 .

[25]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[26]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Introduction: Agents and Norms: How to fill the gap? , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[27]  Andreia Malucelli,et al.  Combining ontologies and agents to help in solving the heterogeneity problem in e-commerce negotiations , 2005, International Workshop on Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce.

[28]  T. S. E. Maibaum,et al.  Towards electronic contract performance , 2001, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[29]  Juan Antonio Rodriguez,et al.  On the Design and Construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions , 2001 .

[30]  Hideki Isozaki.  Intelligent Agents VI. Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[31]  Marc Esteva,et al.  AMELI: an agent-based middleware for electronic institutions , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[32]  Henrique Lopes Cardoso,et al.  Assisting and regulating virtual enterprise interoperability through contracts , 2005 .

[33]  F. Dignum,et al.  Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architectures , 1999 .

[34]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Engineering open environments with electronic institutions , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[35]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1999 .

[36]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Deliberative Normative Agents: Principles and Architecture , 1999, ATAL.

[37]  Richard Craswell.  CONTRACT LAW: GENERAL THEORIES , 2000 .