Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND Intravenous fluids are recommended for the treatment of patients who are in septic shock, but higher fluid volumes have been associated with harm in patients who are in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS In this international, randomized trial, we assigned patients with septic shock in the ICU who had received at least 1 liter of intravenous fluid to receive restricted intravenous fluid or standard intravenous fluid therapy; patients were included if the onset of shock had been within 12 hours before screening. The primary outcome was death from any cause within 90 days after randomization. RESULTS We enrolled 1554 patients; 770 were assigned to the restrictive-fluid group and 784 to the standard-fluid group. Primary outcome data were available for 1545 patients (99.4%). In the ICU, the restrictive-fluid group received a median of 1798 ml of intravenous fluid (interquartile range, 500 to 4366); the standard-fluid group received a median of 3811 ml (interquartile range, 1861 to 6762). At 90 days, death had occurred in 323 of 764 patients (42.3%) in the restrictive-fluid group, as compared with 329 of 781 patients (42.1%) in the standard-fluid group (adjusted absolute difference, 0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.7 to 4.9; P = 0.96). In the ICU, serious adverse events occurred at least once in 221 of 751 patients (29.4%) in the restrictive-fluid group and in 238 of 772 patients (30.8%) in the standard-fluid group (adjusted absolute difference, -1.7 percentage points; 99% CI, -7.7 to 4.3). At 90 days after randomization, the numbers of days alive without life support and days alive and out of the hospital were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Among adult patients with septic shock in the ICU, intravenous fluid restriction did not result in fewer deaths at 90 days than standard intravenous fluid therapy. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and others; CLASSIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03668236.).

M. Nalos | J. Laake | S. Jakob | V. Pettilä | E. Joelsson-Alm | T. Lange | J. Wetterslev | N. Andersen-Ranberg | A. Perner | M. Siegemund | M. Bestle | M. Greco | B. Rasmussen | P. Mouncey | M. Møller | Lone M. Poulsen | K. Strand | J. White | L. Quist | M. Ostermann | T. Meyhoff | P. B. Hjortrup | D. Gould | S. Aagaard | K. Rowan | M. N. Kjær | C. J. S. Hjortsø | T. Jensen | L. Russell | T. Hildebrandt | C. Sølling | A. C. Brøchner | M. Cronhjort | A. B. Jonsson | M. Cecconi | H. Bundgaard | Christian Ahlstedt | M. Malbrain | C. Pfortmueller | Praleene Sivapalan | S. Hoffmann | J. Raděj | B. Westergaard | Lars Nebrich | M. Vang | Nick Meier | C. Overgaard-Steensen | T. N. Aslam | T. S. Straarup | Martin Schønemann-Lund | B. Brand | J. Christensen | C. Elvander | Janus Engstrøm | Jacob V Jensen | Marie Winther‐Olesen | Neeliya A Joseph | Louise S Herløv | Susan K Pedersen | K. K. Knudsen | Michael L Rasmussen | Yvonne K Martin | F. Friberg | Herman Seter | Sigrid Ådnøy | Philipp Seidel | Bror Johnstad | M. Kříž | B. Johnstad | Y. K. Martin | Lars Quist | M. Schønemann-Lund | Theis Lange | C. J. Hjortsø | M. Ostermann | T. S. Jensen | J. H. Laake | Maurizio Cecconi | Massimiliano Greco | Stephan M. Jakob | Marek Nalos | M. H. Møller | Doug Gould | Jens Christensen | M. Kříž | Manu L N G Malbrain | Christian Overgaard-Steensen | Marie Winther-Olesen | Jonathan O White | Neeliya A Joseph | L. S. Herløv | Susan K Pedersen | Kurt K Knudsen | Therese S Straarup | Søren R Aagaard | Claes F Elvander | Søren K L Hoffmann | M. L. Rasmussen | F. F. Friberg | Herman Seter | Sigrid Ådnøy | Philipp Seidel | Kristian Strand | Kathy M Rowan

[1]  J. Teboul,et al.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? , 2022, Annals of Intensive Care.

[2]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 , 2021, Intensive Care Medicine.

[3]  J. Kellum,et al.  Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA.

[4]  Matthew G. Broyles,et al.  Fluid Responsiveness in the Critically Ill Patient. , 2021, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[5]  H. Gerlach,et al.  Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019— results from a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Critical Care.

[6]  J. Wetterslev,et al.  Lower versus higher fluid volumes during initial management of sepsis - a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. , 2020, Chest.

[7]  R. Gazmuri,et al.  From a pressure-guided to a perfusion-centered resuscitation strategy in septic shock: Critical literature review and illustrative case. , 2019, Journal of critical care.

[8]  M. Nalos,et al.  Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial—Protocol and statistical analysis plan , 2019, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  J. Bakker,et al.  Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, JAMA.

[10]  A. Delaney,et al.  Low-dose corticosteroids for adult patients with septic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis , 2018, Intensive Care Medicine.

[11]  M. Collet,et al.  Development and internal validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS‐ICU) , 2018, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  G. Bernard,et al.  Effect of an Early Resuscitation Protocol on In-hospital Mortality Among Adults With Sepsis and Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[13]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Effect sizes in ongoing randomized controlled critical care trials , 2017, Critical Care.

[14]  Alan E. Jones,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 , 2017, Intensive Care Medicine.

[15]  T. Lange,et al.  Effects of fluid restriction on measures of circulatory efficacy in adults with septic shock , 2017, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[16]  J. Marshall,et al.  Conservative fluid management or deresuscitation for patients with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome following the resuscitation phase of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Intensive Care Medicine.

[17]  Jørn Wetterslev,et al.  Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial , 2016, Intensive Care Medicine.

[18]  J. Takala,et al.  Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review , 2016, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  R. Bellomo,et al.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[20]  SepNet Critical Care Trials Group Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study , 2016, Intensive Care Medicine.

[21]  J. Vincent,et al.  A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis , 2015, Critical Care.

[22]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. , 2014, JAMA.

[23]  J. Jakobsen,et al.  The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[24]  J. Kellum,et al.  Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1) , 2013, Critical Care.

[25]  J. Laurila,et al.  Fluid overload is associated with an increased risk for 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with renal replacement therapy: data from the prospective FINNAKI study , 2012, Critical Care.

[26]  B. Kahan,et al.  Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  P. Böelle,et al.  Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock , 2011, Intensive Care Medicine.