Real-time fuzzy-clustering and CART rules classification of the characteristics of emitted acoustic emission during horizontal single-grit scratch tests

During the unit event of material iteraction in grinding three phenomena are involved, namely: rubbing, ploughing and cutting. Where ploughing and rubbing essentially mean the energy is being applied less efficiently in terms of material removal. Such phenomena usually occurs before or after cutting. Based on this distinction, it is important to identify the effects of these different phenomena experienced during grinding. Acoustic emission (AE) of the material grit interaction is considered the most sensitive monitoring process to investigate such miniscule material change. For this reason, two AE sensors were used to pick up energy information (one verifying the other) correlated to material measurements of the horizontal scratch groove profiles. Such material measurements would display both the material plastic deformation and material removal mechanisms. Accurate material surface profile measurements of the cut groove were made using the Fogale Photomap Profiler which enables the comparison between the corresponding AE signal scratch data. By using short-time Fourier transforms (STFT) and filtration, the salient features for identifying and classifying the phenomena were more distinct between the three different levels of single-grit (SG) phenomena. Given such close data segregation between the phenomenon data sets, fuzzy clustering/genetic algorithm (GA) classification techniques were used to classify and verify the demarcation of SG phenomena. After the cutting, ploughing and rubbing gave a high confidence in terms of classification accuracy, the results from the unit/micro-event to the multi/macro-event, both 1-μm and 0.1-mm grinding test data, were applied to the named classifier for classification. Interesting output results correlated for the classifier signifying a distinction that there is more cutting utilisation than both ploughing and rubbing as the interaction between grit and workpiece become more involved (measured depth of cut increases). With the said classifier technique it is possible to get a percentage utilisation of the grit and material interaction phenomena. In addition, optimised fuzzy clustering was verified against a classification and regression tree (CART) rule-based system giving transparent rule classification. Such findings were then realised into a Simulink model as a potential control system for a micro-grinding simulation or, for real-time industrial control purposes.

[1]  J. Hartigan Statistical theory in clustering , 1985 .

[2]  Xun Chen,et al.  Characteristics of the acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests: Part 2 classification and grinding tests , 2009 .

[3]  Luc Baron,et al.  Fuzzy identification of cutting acoustic emission with extended subtractive cluster analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Ioan D. Marinescu,et al.  Acoustic emission for process control and monitoring of surface integrity during grinding , 1994 .

[5]  Xiaoli Li,et al.  On-line tool condition monitoring system with wavelet fuzzy neural network , 1997, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  Xun Chen,et al.  Experimental investigation of material removal mechanism in single grit grinding , 2012 .

[7]  Ghatu Subhash,et al.  An approximate upper bound approach for the single-grit rotating scratch with a conical tool on pure metal , 2002 .

[8]  S. Pandit,et al.  Application of data dependent systems approach for evaluation of fracture modes during a single-grit scratching , 2002 .

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[10]  Xun Chen,et al.  Characteristics of the acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests: Part 1 characteristics and identification , 2009 .

[11]  Eugène Dieulesaint,et al.  Elastic Waves in Solids II , 2000 .

[12]  Steven W. Smith,et al.  The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing , 1997 .

[13]  E. Whitenton,et al.  Acoustic emission monitoring of high speed grinding of silicon nitride , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[14]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  Wavelets and filter banks , 1996 .

[15]  Krzysztof Jemielniak,et al.  Experimental and fuzzy modelling analysis on dynamic cutting force in micro milling , 2013, Soft Computing.

[16]  Dr.,et al.  Characteristics of acoustic emission during single diamond scratching of granite , 2002 .

[17]  Xun Chen,et al.  Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming , 2009 .

[18]  Jonathan R. M. Hosking,et al.  Partitioning Nominal Attributes in Decision Trees , 1999, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[19]  Andreas J. Brunner,et al.  Acoustic emission sensor properties of active fibre composite elements compared with commercial acoustic emission sensors , 2004 .

[20]  Yuan Zhejun,et al.  Tool wear monitoring with wavelet packet transform—fuzzy clustering method , 1998 .

[21]  K. Holford Acoustic Emission–Basic Principles and Future Directions , 2000 .

[22]  Junz Jiunn-jyh Wang,et al.  A stochastic grinding force model considering random grit distribution , 2008 .

[23]  A. Cuevas,et al.  Cluster analysis: a further approach based on density estimation , 2001 .

[24]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Mechanical and thermal behaviours of grinding acoustic emission , 2007, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..