Biochemical investigation of Providence strains and their relationship to the Proteus group

1. Seventy-four urease negative and twelve urease weakly positive strains were studied which, according to their biochemical properties, had to be considered as belonging to the Providence group. Thirty Proteus rettgeri and five anaerogenic Proteus species were examined concomitantly. 2. 668 strains of Enterobacteriaceae were tested for the P.P.A. reaction, of which only the 192 Proteus and the 86 Providence strains rapidly transformed phenylalanine into phenylpyruvic acid. 3. P.P.A. test, IMViC reactions, fermentation properties, smell, swarming are similar to those of the Proteus group, particularly P. rettgeri; it is therefore suggested that the Providence strains should be incorporated in the Proteus group. 4. For all purposes the P.P.A. reaction appears to be better suited than the urea test for differentiating strains of Enterobacteriaceae from the Proteus-Providence group. The authors are grateful to Dr C. A. Stuart, Brown University, Providence, and Dr M. Greenstein, Sewage Disposal Works, Providence; to Dr W. H. Ewing, Communicable Disease Center, Chamblee, Georgia; to Prof. L. Olitzki, Hebrew University, Jerusalem; to Dr R. Mushin, University of Melbourne, Australia. We are especially indebted to Miss E. Salomon and Miss A. Engel for their valuable technical assistance.

[1]  W. Ewing,et al.  The status of serologic typing in the family Enterobacteriaceae. , 1952, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[2]  M. Brooke Biochemical investigations on certain urinary strains of enterobacteriaceae: (1) B. cloacae, (2) "Providence". , 2009, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. Singer Culture of Enterobacteriaceae. III. Detection of urease and indol in a single medium. , 1951, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  S. D. Henriksen A COMPARISON OF THE PHENYLPYRUVIC ACID REACTION AND THE UREASE TEST IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF PROTEUS FROM OTHER ENTERIC ORGANISMS , 1950, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  J. Singer Culture of Enterobacteriaceae; I. A practical medium containing urea, tryptone, lactose and indicators. , 1950, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  P. Collins,et al.  The Isolation and Distribution in Florida of an Anaerogenic Paracolon, Type 29911 , 1947, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  W. Ewing,et al.  Shigella Types Encountered in the Mediterranean Area , 1947, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  H. Plass Outbreak of Diarrheal Disease associated with Paracolon. , 1947 .

[9]  W. B. Christensen,et al.  Urea Decomposition as a Means of Differentiating Proteus and Paracolon Cultures from Each Other and from Salmonella and Shigella Types , 1946, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  V. Mcgann,et al.  Further Studies on One Anaerogenic Paracolon Organism, Type 29911 , 1946, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  C. A. Stuart,et al.  The Biochemical and Serological Relationships of the Organisms of the Genus Proteus , 1945, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  H. Sachs A Report on an Investigation into the Characteristics of New Types of Non-Mannitol-Fermenting Bacilli Isolated from Cases of Bacillary Dysentery in India and Egypt , 1943 .

[13]  C. A. Stuart,et al.  Biochemical and Antigenic Relationships of the Paracolon Bacteria , 1943, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  W. L. Ritchie Ultra-Violet Radiation and Actinotherapy , 1926 .

[15]  R. Hewlett A Manual of Determinative Bacteriology , 1902, Nature.