Adhesive dental materials and their durability

Adhesive materials are used in dentistry because they are conservative and generally aesthetic, i.e. tooth coloured. Two main classes of material are involved, the glass-ionomer cements and the composite resins. This review describes the way they are bonded to the tooth and highlights their differences. Glass ionomers develop a zone of interaction with the tooth as they age which ultimately gives an extremely strong bond, and results in excellent retention rates. By contrast, bonding of composite resins is more complicated and possibly less effective, though these materials have better wear resistance and better aesthetics than glass ionomers. Assessment of bond durability is difficult. This is because a dental restorative can fail by a number of mechanisms apart from debonding: for example, through wear or fracture. The tooth may also show additional decay (secondary caries), hence the filling may need to be replaced. Clinical studies of survival tend to be as much concerned with these aspects as with the bond between the restoration and the tooth. Results from these clinical studies suggest that the various types of adhesive bond survive well in the demanding service conditions of the mouth.

[1]  W. Douglas Clinical status of dentine bonding agents. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  G Willems,et al.  Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  D. McComb,et al.  SEM characterization of the resin-dentine interface produced in vivo. , 1995, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  G. V. Newman Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. , 1965, American journal of orthodontics.

[6]  J. Nicholson,et al.  A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light-cured glass-ionomer cements , 1992, British Dental Journal.

[7]  D. Smith,et al.  The bond strength of a zinc polycarboxylate cement. Investigations into the behaviour under varying conditions. , 1969, British dental journal.

[8]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  John William Nicholson Adhesive dental materials : A review , 1998 .

[10]  G A Maryniuk,et al.  Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  M. Braden,et al.  Diffusion of Water in Composite Filling Materials , 1976, Journal of dental research.

[12]  J. Fricker A new self-curing resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets in vivo. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  Effect of 2-(Methacryloxy)ethyl Phenyl Hydrogen Phosphate on Adhesion to Dentin , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[14]  J. Meyer,et al.  Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[15]  J. Nicholson,et al.  Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. , 1997, Quintessence international.

[16]  N. McIntyre,et al.  Studies on the Adhesion of Glass-ionomer Cements to Dentin , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[17]  L. Mair Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[18]  E. A. Wasson Reinforced glass-ionomer cements--a review of properties and clinical use. , 1993, Clinical materials.

[19]  B. Zachrisson,et al.  Enamel cracks in debonded, debanded, and orthodontically untreated teeth. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  H. J. Prosser,et al.  Adhesion of carboxylate cements to hydroxyapatite. I. The effect of the structure of aliphatic carboxylates on their uptake by hydroxyapatite. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[21]  H. Lüthy,et al.  Bond strength of one-bottle dentin bonding agents on human dentin. , 1997, American journal of dentistry.

[22]  I. Mjör,et al.  Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. , 1997, Quintessence international.

[23]  G. Mount,et al.  A revised classification of carious lesions by site and size. , 1997, Quintessence international.

[24]  S. Matsuya,et al.  IR and NMR Analyses of Hardening and Maturation of Glass-ionomer Cement , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[25]  S. Mitra Adhesion to Dentin and Physical Properties of a Light-cured Glass-ionomer Liner/Base , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[26]  V. Qvist,et al.  Longevity and Cariostatic Effects of Everyday Conventional Glass-ionomer and Amalgam Restorations in Primary Teeth: Three-year Results , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[27]  E. Andrzejewska,et al.  The role of oxygen in camphorquinone‐initiated photopolymerization , 1998 .

[28]  W. Finger,et al.  Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[29]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin. , 1992, Quintessence international.

[30]  E. W. Skinner,et al.  Skinner's science of dental materials , 1973 .

[31]  I. Mjör Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[32]  John William Nicholson,et al.  New Aspects of the Setting of Glass-ionomer Cements , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[33]  P. L. Sadowsky,et al.  Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. An in vitro study. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[34]  M. Tyas,et al.  Clinical performance of three restorative materials for non-undercut cervical abrasion lesions. , 1985, Australian dental journal.

[35]  C. Charles Bonding orthodontic brackets with glass-ionomer cement. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[36]  H. Alhadainy,et al.  2-year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems. , 1996, American journal of dentistry.

[37]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.

[38]  Alan D. Wilson,et al.  Mechanism of Adhesion of Polyelectrolyte Cements to Hydroxyapatite , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[39]  D. Williams,et al.  The characteristics and performance of dentine bonding agents. , 1993, Clinical materials.

[40]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  J. Nicholson,et al.  The use of organic compounds of phosphorus in clinical dentistry. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[42]  R. Noort Introduction to Dental Materials , 1994 .