The Effect Of Microcomputer-Generated Reminders On Influenza Vaccination Rates In A University-Based Family Practice Center

Less than 20 percent of elderly and other high-risk persons targeted for annual influenza vaccination are immunized each year. In most busy practice settings, it is difficult for primary care physicians to identify every patient in need of preventive health interventions. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of microcomputer-generated reminders on influenza vaccination rates in a university-based family practice center. The practice uses an interactive encounter form system from which updated clinical information is routinely entered into a cumulative database. During a 2-month period, 686 patients were identified in the database as eligible to receive influenza vaccine according to accepted criteria. Practice physicians (n = 32) were stratified by level of training and randomized to one of three groups, thereby receiving printed reminders on the encounter forms of all, none, or half of their eligible patients. Patients of physicians who always received reminders were more likely to receive influenza vaccine during the study period than patients of the never-reminded physicians (51 percent versus 30 percent, P < 0.001). Patients whose physicians received reminders for only half their patients had an intermediate likelihood of receiving a vaccination if a reminder was printed (38 percent) but were less likely than the patients of never-reminded physicians to receive the vaccine if no reminder was printed (20 percent, P < 0.001). This study suggests that physicians learn to depend on reminders for preventive health activities and that reminders are most effective when they are provided at every patient encounter.

[1]  D. Fedson,et al.  Influenza and pneumococcal immunization in medical clinics, 1978-1980. , 1983, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  B. Littenberg,et al.  Improving Physician Compliance With Preventive Medicine Guidelines , 1982, Medical care.

[3]  Tucker Jb,et al.  Patient response to mail cues recommending influenza vaccine. , 1987 .

[4]  J. W. Frank,et al.  Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 1. Determinants of acceptance. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[5]  C. Chambers,et al.  Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  D. Fedson,et al.  Influenza prevention and control. Past practices and future prospects. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Tucker,et al.  Patient response to mail cues recommending influenza vaccine. , 1987, Family medicine.

[8]  D. Fedson Influenza and pneumococcal immunization strategies for physicians. , 1987, Chest.

[9]  D. Klachko,et al.  Effect of a microcomputer-based registry on adult immunizations. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[10]  Klachko Dm,et al.  Effect of a microcomputer-based registry on adult immunizations. , 1989 .

[11]  V. Clark,et al.  Educating physicians and treating patients in the ambulatory setting. Where are we going and how will we know when we arrive? , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  K. Margolis,et al.  Organizational strategies to improve influenza vaccine delivery. A standing order in a general medicine clinic. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  C. McDonald,et al.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  R. Brimberry Vaccination of high-risk patients for influenza. A comparison of telephone and mail reminder methods. , 1988, The Journal of family practice.

[15]  D. Roberts,et al.  The statistical program SYSTAT : Wilkinson, L. (1986). SYSTAT, The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc. 2902 Central Street, Evanston, IL 60201. , 1987 .

[16]  C. McDonald Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.