Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization by consumers: Investigations into the number of terms used in CATA questions
暂无分享,去创建一个
Michelle K. Beresford | Amy G. Paisley | S. Jaeger | Lucía Antúnez | Leticia Vidal | R. Cadena | A. Giménez | G. Ares
[1] R. Fisher,et al. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. , 1955 .
[2] Earl R. Babbie,et al. The practice of social research , 1969 .
[3] P. Robert,et al. A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV‐Coefficient , 1976 .
[4] Anthony A. Williams,et al. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports , 1984 .
[5] Edward B. Manoukian,et al. Mathematical nonparametric statistics , 1986 .
[6] J. Krosnick,et al. AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT , 1987 .
[7] Norman M. Bradburn,et al. DO RESPONDENTS REALLY “MARK ALL THAT APPLY” ON SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONS? , 1994 .
[8] K. Tie,et al. Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.
[9] Ian Wakeling,et al. Mealiness in Apples: Towards a Multilingual Consumer Vocabulary , 2001 .
[10] R. Popper,et al. The effect of attribute questions on overall liking ratings , 2004 .
[11] R. Fisher. Statistical methods for research workers , 1927, Protoplasma.
[12] Sébastien Lê,et al. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .
[13] Adriana Gámbaro,et al. Texture concepts for consumers: a better understanding of crispy–crunchy sensory perception , 2008 .
[14] Dominique Valentin,et al. Aroma properties of young Spanish monovarietal white wines: a study using sorting task, list of terms and frequency of citation , 2008 .
[15] Jérôme Pagès,et al. Testing the significance of the RV coefficient , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[16] Age K. Smilde,et al. Real-life metabolomics data analysis : how to deal with complex data ? , 2010 .
[17] Young-Seung Lee,et al. The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping , 2010 .
[18] Dominique Valentin,et al. Comparison of conventional descriptive analysis and a citation frequency-based descriptive method for odor profiling: An application to Burgundy Pinot noir wines , 2010 .
[19] Gastón Ares,et al. APPLICATION OF A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHOCOLATE MILK DESSERTS , 2010 .
[20] G. Ares,et al. EXPLORING AND EXPLAINING CREAMINESS PERCEPTION: CONSUMERS' UNDERLYING CONCEPTS , 2011 .
[21] Gastón Ares,et al. EXTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING OF COMMERCIAL ANTIAGING CREAMS BASED ON CONSUMERS' RESPONSES TO A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION , 2011 .
[22] Gastón Ares,et al. CONSUMERS' TEXTURE PERCEPTION OF MILK DESSERTS. II – COMPARISON WITH TRAINED ASSESSORS' DATA , 2012 .
[23] Gastón Ares,et al. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization , 2012 .
[24] Jason Parcon,et al. A method to investigate the stability of a sorting map , 2012 .
[25] Daniel M. Ennis,et al. Analysis and Thurstonian Scaling of Applicability Scores , 2013 .
[26] S. V. Lipchock,et al. Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.
[27] Gastón Ares,et al. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) responses elicited by consumers: Within-assessor reproducibility and stability of sensory product characterizations , 2013 .
[28] S. Jaeger,et al. Investigation of bias of hedonic scores when co-eliciting product attribute information using CATA questions , 2013 .
[29] C. J. Findlay,et al. Experimental consideration for the use of check‐all‐that‐apply questions to describe the sensory properties of orange juices , 2013 .
[30] S. Jaeger,et al. CATA questions for sensory product characterization: Raising awareness of biases , 2013 .
[31] Tormod Næs,et al. Performance indices in descriptive sensory analysis – A complimentary screening tool for assessor and panel performance , 2013 .
[32] John C. Castura,et al. Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data , 2013 .
[33] S. Jaeger,et al. Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization , 2013 .
[34] Michelle K. Beresford,et al. A Mendelian Trait for Olfactory Sensitivity Affects Odor Experience and Food Selection , 2013, Current Biology.
[35] Gastón Ares,et al. Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions , 2014 .
[36] S. Jaeger,et al. Lack of evidence that concurrent sensory product characterisation using CATA questions bias hedonic scores , 2014 .
[37] Hervé Abdi,et al. An ExPosition of multivariate analysis with the singular value decomposition in R , 2014, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[38] Gastón Ares,et al. Visual attention by consumers to check-all-that-apply questions: Insights to support methodological development , 2014 .
[39] Gastón Ares,et al. Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterisation , 2014 .
[40] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[41] Gastón Ares,et al. Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers , 2014 .
[42] Gastón Ares,et al. Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: Rate-all-that-apply (RATA) , 2014 .
[43] Richard Popper. Use of Just-About-Right Scales in Consumer Research , 2014 .
[44] S. Jaeger,et al. Examination of sensory product characterization bias when check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions are used concurrently with hedonic assessments , 2015 .
[45] El Mostafa Qannari,et al. Measures of association between two datasets; Application to sensory data , 2015 .