The effect of PSF spatial-variance and nonlinear transducer geometry on motion estimation from echocardiography

Two-dimensional echocardiography continues to be the most widely used modality for the assessment of cardiac function due to its effectiveness, ease of use, and low costs. Echocardiographic images are derived from the mechanical interaction between the ultrasound field and the contractile heart tissue. Previously, in [6], based on B-mode echocardiographic simulations, we showed that motion estimation errors are significantly higher in shift-varying simulations when compared to shift-invariant simulations. In order to ascertain the effect of the spatial variance of the Ultrasonic field point spread function (PSF) and the transducer geometry on motion estimation, in the current paper, several simple canonical cardiac motions such as translation in axial and horizontal direction, and out-of-plane motion were simulated and the motion estimation errors were calculated. For axial motions, the greatest angular errors occurred within the lateral regions of the image, irrespective of the motion estimation technique that was adopted. We hypothesize that the transducer geometry and the PSF spatial-variance were the underlying sources of error for the motion estimation methods. No similar conclusions could be made regarding motion estimation errors for azimuthal and out-of-plane ultrasound simulations.

[1]  Denis Friboulet,et al.  Motion decorrelation in echocardiography: Analysis from a realistic simulation , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[2]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Evaluation of 2-D speckle tracking based strain rate imaging (SRI) using a 3-D heart simulation model , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[3]  J C Bamber,et al.  Ultrasonic B-scanning: a computer simulation , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Denis Friboulet,et al.  Influence of system geometry on motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[5]  J. Meunier,et al.  Echographic image mean gray level changes with tissue dynamics: a system-based model study , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J. D'hooge,et al.  A fast convolution-based methodology to simulate 2-Dd/3-D cardiac ultrasound images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Michael Unser,et al.  Myocardial motion analysis from B-mode echocardiograms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Michael J. Black,et al.  The Robust Estimation of Multiple Motions: Parametric and Piecewise-Smooth Flow Fields , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[9]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[10]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Towards pointwise motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences - Comparing the reliability of different features for speckle tracking , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Denis Friboulet,et al.  Analysis of motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences: influence of system geometry and point-spread function. , 2010, Ultrasonics.

[12]  Amir A. Amini,et al.  Comparison of myocardial motion estimation methods based on simulated echocardiographic B-mode and RF data , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[13]  A. Douglas,et al.  Description of the deformation of the left ventricle by a kinematic model. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Three-Dimensional Cardiac Strain Estimation Using Spatio–Temporal Elastic Registration of Ultrasound Images: A Feasibility Study , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  J A Jensen,et al.  A model for the propagation and scattering of ultrasound in tissue. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.