Use of Spatial Capture‐Recapture Modeling and DNA Data to Estimate Densities of Elusive Animals

Assessment of abundance, survival, recruitment rates, and density (i.e., population assessment) is especially challenging for elusive species most in need of protection (e.g., rare carnivores). Individual identification methods, such as DNA sampling, provide ways of studying such species efficiently and noninvasively. Additionally, statistical methods that correct for undetected animals and account for locations where animals are captured are available to efficiently estimate density and other demographic parameters. We collected hair samples of European wildcat (Felis silvestris) from cheek-rub lure sticks, extracted DNA from the samples, and identified each animals' genotype. To estimate the density of wildcats, we used Bayesian inference in a spatial capture-recapture model. We used WinBUGS to fit a model that accounted for differences in detection probability among individuals and seasons and between two lure arrays. We detected 21 individual wildcats (including possible hybrids) 47 times. Wildcat density was estimated at 0.29/km² (SE 0.06), and 95% of the activity of wildcats was estimated to occur within 1.83 km from their home-range center. Lures located systematically were associated with a greater number of detections than lures placed in a cell on the basis of expert opinion. Detection probability of individual cats was greatest in late March. Our model is a generalized linear mixed model; hence, it can be easily extended, for instance, to incorporate trap- and individual-level covariates. We believe that the combined use of noninvasive sampling techniques and spatial capture-recapture models will improve population assessments, especially for rare and elusive animals.

[1]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[2]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Long‐distance wolf recolonization of France and Switzerland inferred from non‐invasive genetic sampling over a period of 10 years , 2003 .

[3]  A. Agrawal,et al.  The Statistics of Rarity1 , 2005 .

[4]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. , 2009, Ecology.

[5]  J. DeWoody,et al.  A non-invasive genetic evaluation of population size, natal philopatry, and roosting behavior of non-breeding eastern imperial eagles (Aquila heliaca) in central Asia , 2008, Conservation Genetics.

[6]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera Traps in Animal Ecology , 2011 .

[7]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. , 2008, Ecology.

[8]  A A Schäffer,et al.  A genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the domestic cat (Felis catus). , 1999, Genomics.

[9]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Bear conservation genetics , 1992, Nature.

[10]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[11]  E. McCain,et al.  Evidence of Resident Jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Southwestern United States and the Implications for Conservation , 2008 .

[12]  P. Lukacs,et al.  Review of capture–recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[13]  David Paetkau,et al.  Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears , 1999 .

[14]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating Black Bear Density Using DNA Data From Hair Snares , 2010 .

[15]  A. Noss,et al.  Geoffroy's cats at the northern limit of their range: activity patterns and density estimates from camera trapping in Bolivian dry forests , 2006 .

[16]  I. Eckert DNA-Analysen zum genetischen Status der Wildkatze (Felis silvestris) in Deutschland , 2006 .

[17]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Camera-trap study of ocelot and other secretive mammals in the northern Pantanal , 2005 .

[18]  M. Beaumont,et al.  Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids using Bayesian clustering methods. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation , 2008 .

[20]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[21]  L. L. Cam,et al.  Maximum likelihood : an introduction , 1990 .

[22]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification , 1999 .

[23]  W. Link Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture‐Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities , 2003, Biometrics.

[24]  K. Hupe,et al.  The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication , 2007, Science.

[25]  O. Gimenez,et al.  Use of Integrated Modeling to Enhance Estimates of Population Dynamics Obtained from Limited Data , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. , 2010, Ecology.

[27]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[28]  E. Randi,et al.  Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[29]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Urine collected in the field as a source of DNA for species and individual identification , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[30]  R Higuchi,et al.  Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. , 2013, BioTechniques.

[31]  B. Baur,et al.  Genetic variability in subpopulations of the asp viper (Vipera aspis) in the Swiss Jura mountains: implications for a conservation strategy , 2000 .

[32]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies. , 2009, Ecology.

[33]  D. Freedman,et al.  On the consistency of Bayes estimates , 1986 .