Storytelling with robots: Learning companions for preschool children's language development

Children's oral language skills in preschool can predict their academic success later in life. As such, increasing children's skills early on could improve their success in middle and high school. To this end, we propose that a robotic learning companion could supplement children's early language education. The robot targets both the social nature of language learning and the adaptation necessary to help individual children. The robot is designed as a social character that interacts with children as a peer, not as a tutor or teacher. It will play a storytelling game, during which it will introduce new vocabulary words, and model good story narration skills, such as including a beginning, middle, and end; varying sentence structure; and keeping cohesion across the story. We will evaluate whether adapting the robot's level of language to the child's - so that, as children improve their storytelling skills, so does the robot - influences (i) whether children learn new words from the robot, (ii) the complexity and style of stories children tell, (iii) the similarity of children's stories to the robot's stories. We expect children will learn more from a robot that adapts to maintain an equal or greater ability than the children, and that they will copy its stories and narration style more than they would with a robot that does not adapt (a robot of lesser ability). However, we also expect that playing with a robot of lesser ability could prompt teaching or mentoring behavior from children, which could also be beneficial to language learning.

[1]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Chapter 5 Human Mimicry , 2009 .

[2]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  L. Toledo-Pereyra Trust , 2006, Mediation Behaviour.

[4]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Foundations for a New Science of Learning , 2009, Science.

[5]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back , 2012, TIIS.

[6]  Po-Yao Chao,et al.  Exploring the Possibility of Using Humanoid Robots as Instructional Tools for Teaching a Second Language in Primary School , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Ralf Dresner,et al.  Rethinking Context Language As An Interactive Phenomenon , 2016 .

[8]  Charles Fernyhough,et al.  Young children's trust in their mother's claims: longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. , 2009, Child development.

[9]  Patton O. Tabors,et al.  Is Literacy Enough?: Pathways to Academic Success for Adolescents , 2007 .

[10]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[11]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Multimodal Affect Modeling and Recognition for Empathic Robot Companions , 2013, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[12]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Social gating and pedagogy: Mechanisms for learning and implications for robotics , 2010, Neural Networks.

[13]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Building long-term relationships with virtual and robotic characters: the role of remembering , 2011, The Visual Computer.

[14]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Piercarlo Valdesolo,et al.  Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. , 2011, Emotion.

[16]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Javier R. Movellan,et al.  Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[19]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  MAINTAINING ENGAGEMENT IN LONG-TERM INTERVENTIONS WITH RELATIONAL AGENTS , 2010, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[20]  Adam Setapen,et al.  Creating robotic characters for long-term interaction , 2012 .

[21]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Young Children Treat Robots as Informants , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[22]  J. Cassell,et al.  Towards a model of technology and literacy development: Story listening systems , 2004 .

[23]  Margaret Fish,et al.  Language skills in low-SES rural Appalachian children: normative development and individual differences, infancy to preschool , 2003 .

[24]  Patton O. Tabors,et al.  Dual language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking preschool children. , 2007, Journal of applied developmental psychology.

[25]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Personalization in HRI: A longitudinal field experiment , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  S. Suter Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[27]  Gwo-Dong Chen,et al.  A Survey on Storytelling with Robots , 2011, Edutainment.

[28]  John H. Mabry,et al.  Review of Hart and Risley’s Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children , 1997 .

[29]  Scott S. Wiltermuth,et al.  Synchrony and Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.

[30]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  You, robot: on the linguistic construction of artificial others , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[31]  Natalie Anne Freed,et al.  "This is the fluffy robot that only speaks French" : language use between preschoolers, their families, and a social robot while sharing virtual toys , 2012 .