The Defragmentation of Creativity: Future Directions with an Emphasis on Educational Applications

In recent years, there has been a virtual explosion in the creativity literature of topics, perspectives and methodologies; yet investigators in one subfield often seem entirely unaware of advances in another. The field of creativity research has become increasingly fragmented, but how should defragmentation proceed, if at all? Should researchers attempt to construct a unified systems theory of creativity ? The argument is made that a defragmentation of the creativity field should not entail wholesale reduction to models that fail to help us understand reality and generate new hypotheses. Some models may be hazardous because they distort reality either by oversimplification or, in an opposite vein, by complicating our understanding through attempts to include all aspects and instances of the process of creativity across all cultures into one unified model or by losing sight of the applied goals of our research. Specific models of creativity and specific issues related to enhancing creativity in our schools are presented as part of this discussion.

[1]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  Creativity in Advertising: When It Works and When it Doesn't , 2013 .

[2]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[3]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Psychological Research in the Classroom: Issues for Educators and Researchers , 1982 .

[4]  John Baer,et al.  Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract, and disappoint. , 2011 .

[5]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[6]  Roger Martin.  The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage , 2009 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  A Systems Perspective on Creativity , 2006 .

[8]  Roland S Persson,et al.  Cultural Variation and Dominance in a Globalised Knowledge-Economy: Towards a Culture-Sensitive Research Paradigm in the Science of Giftedness , 2012 .

[9]  Roger E. Backhouse,et al.  The Concept of Applied Economics: A History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings , 2000 .

[10]  Beth A. Hennessey,et al.  The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented , 2005 .

[11]  Don Ambrose,et al.  Interdisciplinary expansion of conceptual foundations: Insights from beyond our field , 2005 .

[12]  Roland S Persson,et al.  The Needs of the Highly Able and the Needs of Society: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Talent Differentiation and Its Significance to Gifted Education and Issues of Societal Inequality , 2014 .

[13]  Derek van Bever,et al.  Consulting on the Cusp of Disruption , 2013 .

[14]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity , 2009 .

[15]  Maryanne M. Gobble,et al.  Design Thinking , 2010, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[16]  V. Opfer,et al.  Learning 21st-Century Skills Requires 21st-Century Teaching , 2012 .

[17]  Malcolm W. Watson.  Chapter 6 – Developmental Psychologists in the Classroom , 1982 .

[18]  Erik W. Robelen.  Coming to Schools: Creativity Indexes. , 2012 .

[19]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Motivación de los empleados: un poderoso modelo nuevo , 2008 .

[20]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[21]  J. Marriott,et al.  The Scope and Method of Political Economy , 2018 .

[22]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy.  E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[23]  V. Glăveanu,et al.  Creativity As Cultural Participation , 2011 .

[24]  Choton Basu,et al.  Disrupting Class How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns , 2009 .