Performance evaluation of different types of steel moment resisting frames subjected to strong ground motion through incremental dynamic analysis

Comparative studies on seismic performance for various types of steel moment resisting frames subjected to near field and far field earthquakes are performed through Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method in this study. Near field earthquake has a pulse like effects on the structures. It imports immediate force in very short duration to buildings. Therefore, destructive effects of surge energy are not negligible. Four intensity indices are used, namely, peak acceleration (PGA), spectral acceleration at the structure’s first-mode period (Sa(T1, 5%)), spectral acceleration at the structure’s nth effective-mode period (Sa(Tn, 5%)) and the Spectral velocity at the structure’s first-mode period (Sv(T1, 5%)). Numerical results illustrate that the intensity measure parameters related to ground velocity and the higher mode-related parameters present better correlation with the seismic responses of near source ground motion for given systems. The higher mode-related parameters are more suitable for tall systems subjected to near field earthquakes. Moreover, the chosen parameters Sa(Tn, 5%) and Sv(T1, 5%) of near-fault impulsive ground motions enhance the performance of intensity measure of corresponding conventional parameters, i.e. Sa(T1, 5%). A comparison for the special and intermediate steel moment resisting frames is made as regard to performance using IDA method. A more efficient performance is observed for the special moment resisting frames compare to intermediate ones.

[1]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Seismic Design of Steel Structures , 2013 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information , 2005 .

[3]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF METROPOLITAN TEHRAN, IRAN , 2003 .

[4]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[5]  Abdolreza Joghataie,et al.  Optimal control of nonlinear frames by Newmark and distributed genetic algorithms , 2012 .

[6]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[7]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  Estimation of seismic demands of steel frames subjected to near‐fault earthquakes having forward directivity and comparing with pushover analysis results , 2013 .

[8]  Behrouz Asgarian,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frames through incremental dynamic analysis , 2010 .

[9]  S. Mahin,et al.  Aseismic design implications of near‐fault san fernando earthquake records , 1978 .

[10]  Dixiong Yang,et al.  Non‐structure‐specific intensity measure parameters and characteristic period of near‐fault ground motions , 2009 .

[11]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  AMPLIFICATION FACTORS TO ESTIMATE INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS FOR THE DESIGN OF STRUCTURES IN THE NEAR FIELD , 2000 .

[12]  Babak Alavi-Shushtari,et al.  Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures , 2000 .