Self-calibrated collinearity detector

The human visual system can make remarkably precise spatial judgements. There are reasons to believe that this accuracy is achieved and maintained by using processes that calibrate and correct errors in the system. This work investigate this problem of self-calibration and describes an adaptive system for detecting the collinearity of points and the straightness of lines. The system is initially inaccurate, but, by using an error correction mechanism, it eventually becomes highly accurate. The error correction is performed by a simple self calibration process named proportional multi-gain adjustment. The calibration process adjusts the gain values of the system input units. The process utilizes statistical regularities in the input stimuli. It compensate for errors due to noise in the input units receptive fields location and response functions by ensuring that the average deviation from collinearity offset detected by the system is zero. As a by product of the error correction, the system exhibits also adaptation and aftereffect phenomena, similar to those observed in the human visual system.

[1]  D. P. Andrews.  Error-correcting Perceptual Mechanisms , 1964 .

[2]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by hebbian covariance , 1989, Nature.

[3]  M. Coltheart.  Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. , 1971, Psychological review.

[4]  E. Ludvigh.  Direction sense of the eye. , 1953, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  H. Wilson,et al.  Discrimination of contour curvature: data and theory. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  E. Kandel,et al.  Classical conditioning and sensitization share aspects of the same molecular cascade in Aplysia. , 1983, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[7]  C. Blakemore,et al.  An analysis of orientation selectivity in the cat's visual cortex , 1974, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  R B Welch,et al.  Research on Adaptation to Rearranged Vision: 1966–1974 , 1974, Perception.

[9]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[10]  S. Zucker,et al.  Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature , 1987, Nature.

[11]  D. P. Andrews.  Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea part I: Short lines , 1967 .

[12]  J. Platt.  How we see straight Lines. , 1960, Scientific American.

[13]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons , 1988, Nature.

[14]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. , 1973, Vision research.

[15]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Contour curvature analysis: Hyperacuities in the discrimination of detailed shape , 1982, Vision Research.

[16]  S. Ullman,et al.  Adaptation and gain normalization , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .

[18]  R. Watt.  Further evidence concerning the analysis of curvature in human foveal vision , 1984, Vision Research.

[19]  R. Nicoll,et al.  The current excitement in long term potentiation , 1988, Neuron.