Spatial summation of peripheral Gabor patches.

Previous studies have specified the foveal pattern that is seen most efficiently, with the assumption that the waveform of the best pattern matches the impulse response of the most sensitive visual filter. We measured the threshold contrast for circular, collinear, and orthogonal Gabor stimuli of 6 Hz temporal frequency presented 7 deg above the fixation point. We found that the threshold contrast energy is minimal for a class of stimuli whose Fourier-spectra bandwidth is less than approximately 1 octave. These findings suggest that an energy algorithm might underlie spatial summation of peripheral Gabor patches. The different behavior of spatial summation in fovea and periphery might reflect the differences in pattern detectability across space in the central and peripheral visual fields. It is also possible that a coherent (cross-correlation) algorithm is employed in detection of foveal stimuli and that an incoherent (energy) algorithm is employed in detection of peripheral stimuli.

[1]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[2]  A. E. Burgess,et al.  Vision: High level visual decision efficiencies , 1991 .

[3]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Visibility of elliptical gaussian blobs , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  Quick Rf.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[5]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Robson,et al.  Summation of very close spatial frequencies: the importance of spatial probability summation , 1987, Vision Research.

[8]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  H R Wilson,et al.  Factors limiting peripheral pattern discrimination. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[11]  J Rovamo,et al.  Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  What does the eye see best? , 1983, Nature.

[13]  A B Watson,et al.  Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: evaluation of five simple models. , 2000, Optics express.

[14]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[15]  C. Rashbass.  The visibility of transient changes of luminance , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  A. Watson,et al.  The optimal motion stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Watson.  Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[18]  H. Barlow.  Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[20]  V. Manahilov,et al.  Energy model for contrast detection: spatiotemporal characteristics of threshold vision , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  S J Anderson,et al.  Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Detectability of power fluctuations of temporal visual noise , 1978, Vision Research.

[23]  L A Temme,et al.  Peripheral Visual Field is Radially Organized , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[24]  A. Watson.  Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location , 1982, Vision Research.

[25]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[26]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Eccentricity dependence of contrast matching and oblique masking , 1985, Vision Research.

[27]  U. Polat,et al.  What pattern the eye sees best , 1999, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[30]  T. Reichert,et al.  Spatial summation effects on two-component grating thresholds. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  M. Banks,et al.  Scotopic visual efficiency: Constraints by optics, receptor properties, and rod pooling , 1992, Vision Research.

[32]  D. Kersten.  Spatial summation in visual noise , 1984, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[34]  C. H. Graham,et al.  AREA AND THE INTENSITY-TIME RELATION IN THE PERIPHERAL RETINA , 1935 .

[35]  V Manahilov.  Triphasic temporal impulse responses and Mach bands in time , 1998, Vision Research.