Measurement and Evaluation of Fuels and Technologies for Passenger Rail Service in North Carolina

The purpose of this project is to measure a baseline for fuel use and emission rates on the rebuilt or replaced engines on each locomotive in the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Rail Division fleet, using ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuel; measure real-world, in-use “over-the-rail” activity, fuel use, and emissions for service between Raleigh and Charlotte; assess the avoided fuel use and emissions from substitution of automobile trips with rail service based on real-world data obtained in this research for the train service and real-world highway vehicle data obtained in recent previous research; and conduct an evaluation of the emissions implications of B20 biodiesel versus ULSD using a life cycle inventory approach that takes into account the fuel cycle, as well as locomotive emissions. The methodology features the use of portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS). The results of this project will enable the NCDOT Rail Division to accurately assess the fuel use and emissions benefits of the engine rebuilds and replacements, the use of alternative fuel, and the energy and emissions benefits of passenger rail service compared to the avoided highway vehicle usage. These data can be used to identify priorities for further emission reduction measures, if needed, and to claim credit for the energy and environmental benefits of rail transportation. These data and information will be useful to the NCDOT Rail Division as the basis for determining the energy and emissions benefits of B20 and of rail versus highway transportation and, thus, as an input to prioritizing future activity pertaining to asset management and community relations.

[1]  S. G. Fritz Evaluation of Biodiesel Fuel in an EMD GP38-2 Locomotive , 2004 .

[2]  M. Vojtíšek-Lom,et al.  Vehicle mass emissions measurements using a portable 5-gas exhaust analyzer and engine computer data , 2009 .

[3]  M. Vojtíšek-Lom,et al.  Development Of Heavy-Duty Diesel Portable, On-Board Mass Exhaust Emissions Monitoring System With NOx, CO2 And Qualitative PM Capabilities , 2001 .

[4]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  On-Road Measurement of Vehicle Tailpipe Emissions Using a Portable Instrument , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[6]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Real-World Fuel use and Emissions for Dump Trucks Fueled with B20 Biodiesel versus Petroleum Diesel , 2006 .

[7]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  In-use measurement of the activity, fuel use, and emissions of eight cement mixer trucks operated on each of petroleum diesel and soy-based B20 biodiesel , 2009 .

[8]  Thomas D. Durbin,et al.  Effects of Biodiesel, Biodiesel Blends, and a Synthetic Diesel on Emissions from Light Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2000 .

[9]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  Characterization of Real-World Activity, Fuel Use, and Emissions for Selected Motor Graders Fueled with Petroleum Diesel and B20 Biodiesel , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Real-World Measurement and Evaluation of Duty Cycles, Fuels, and Emission Control Technologies of Heavy-Duty Trucks , 2012 .

[11]  K. T. Knapp,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Remote Sensing-Based Hydrocarbon Measurements: A Comparison to FID Measurements. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  Life cycle inventory energy consumption and emissions for biodiesel versus petroleum diesel fueled construction vehicles. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.