Introducing CATs to STEM faculty through graduate students

The success of any instructional style in promoting meaningful learning, whether novel or traditional, active or passive, is critically dependent on the engagement of students in the course of instruction. Improving engagement, whether explicitly or implicitly, is a central goal of effective pedagogy. Social learning strategies, such as active or collaborative learning, are one way of improving engagement. A specific type of these is classroom assessment techniques (CATs) as described by Angelo & Cross. This project examines both the impact of including CATs in courses on student engagement as measured through a brief questionnaire and the experience of faculty implementing the methods in their courses. Faculty are supported in their implementation through condensed literature and one-on-one mentoring. Results show that measures of student affect related to the course increase post-intervention and that faculty will continue to implement CATs in their courses.

[1]  D. K. Agrawal,et al.  A quantitative assessment of classroom teaching and learning in engineering education , 2008 .

[2]  Marilla D. Svinicki,et al.  CATs: A Student's Gateway to Better Learning , 1998 .

[3]  Joel A. Michael,et al.  Faculty Perceptions About Barriers to Active Learning , 2007 .

[4]  Nanette Veilleux,et al.  A Multi Institutional Study Of Connection, Community And Engagement In Stem Education: Conceptual Model Development , 2010 .

[5]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty , 2004 .

[6]  G. Goldstein.  Using Classroom Assessment Techniques in an Introductory Statistics Class , 2007 .

[7]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[8]  Devorah A. Lieberman,et al.  Use of Electronic Tools to Enhance Student Evaluation Feedback , 2001 .

[9]  A. Astin,et al.  Undergraduate science education: the impact of different college environments on the educational pip , 1992 .

[10]  Denise E. Agosto.  Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation , 2007 .

[11]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. Second Edition. , 1993 .

[12]  K. Cross.  Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching. , 1996 .

[13]  C. Brooks.  Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty‐first century: blending online communities of practice and face‐to‐face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes , 2010 .

[14]  William Aspray,et al.  A Critical Review of the Research on Women's Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education , 2008 .

[15]  Charles C. Bonwell,et al.  The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom , 1996 .

[16]  M. Silberman.  Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. , 1996 .

[17]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .