Irrelevant Features of a Stimulus Can Either Facilitate or Disrupt Performance in a Working Memory Task: The Role of Fluid Intelligence

It has been shown that fluid intelligence (gf) is fundamental to overcome interference due to information of a previously encoded item along a task-relevant domain. However, the biasing effect of task-irrelevant dimensions is still unclear as well as its relation with gf. The present study aimed at clarifying these issues. Gf was assessed in 60 healthy subjects. In a different session, the same subjects performed two versions (letter-detection and spatial) of a three-back working memory task with a set of physically identical stimuli (letters) presented at different locations on the screen. In the letter-detection task, volunteers were asked to match stimuli on the basis of their identity whereas, in the spatial task, they were required to match items on their locations. Cross-domain bias was manipulated by pseudorandomly inserting a match between the current and the three back items on the irrelevant domain. Our findings showed that a task-irrelevant feature of a salient stimulus can actually bias the ongoing performance. We revealed that, at trials in which the current and the three-back items matched on the irrelevant domain, group accuracy was lower (interference). On the other hand, at trials in which the two items matched on both the relevant and irrelevant domains, the group showed an enhancement of the performance (facilitation). Furthermore, we demonstrated that individual differences in fluid intelligence covaries with the ability to override cross-domain interference in that higher gf subjects showed better performance at interference trials than low gf subjects. Altogether, our findings suggest that stimulus features irrelevant to the task can affect cognitive performance along the relevant domain and that gf plays an important role in protecting relevant memory contents from the hampering effect of such a bias.

[1]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  A. Gevins,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of component processes in human working memory. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  P. Rossini,et al.  Lateralized contribution of prefrontal cortex in controlling task-irrelevant information during verbal and spatial working memory tasks: rTMS evidence , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  B R Postle,et al.  "What"-Then-Where" in visual working memory: an event-related fMRI study. , 1999, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[5]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Dissociating a Common Working Memory Network from Different Neural Substrates of Phonological and Spatial Stimulus Processing , 2002, NeuroImage.

[6]  T. Braver,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control in Working Memory: Effects of Interference Expectancy and Fluid Intelligence , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Working Memory Capacity and Suppression , 1998 .

[8]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: Contributions of human brain lesion studies , 2006, Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Duncan,et al.  Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[11]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  P. McLeod,et al.  Measuring the mind speed, control, and age , 2005 .

[15]  Jason M. Chein,et al.  Domain-general mechanisms of complex working memory span , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Differential patterns of cortical activation as a function of fluid reasoning complexity , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working Memory: A View from Neuroimaging , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Detecting a target letter in briefly presented arrays: A confidence rating analysis in terms of a weighted additive effects model , 1974 .

[20]  J. Duncan Prefrontal cortex and Spearman's g , 2012 .

[21]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[22]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  John A. Swets,et al.  Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis in Psychology and Diagnostics: Collected Papers , 1996 .

[24]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  J. Raven Advanced progressive matrices : sets I and II , 1962 .

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Working Memory for Letters, Shapes, and Locations: fMRI Evidence against Stimulus-Based Regional Organization in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of human working memory revisited Evidence from 3-T fMRI studies using classical domain-specific interference tasks , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Daniel V. Meegan,et al.  Spatial information is processed even when it is task-irrelevant: implications for neuroimaging task design , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  P. Jolicœur,et al.  Visual short-term memory: Central capacity limitations in short-term consolidation , 2007 .

[32]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[33]  J. Jonides,et al.  Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Control of interference during working memory updating. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Evidence for Quantitative Domain Dominance for Verbal and Spatial Working Memory in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2003, Cortex.

[36]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The nature of cognition , 2000 .

[37]  Ruth Seurinck,et al.  The Commonality of Neural Networks for Verbal and Visual Short-term Memory , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Monsell Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  D. Algom,et al.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.

[40]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Visual working memory is disrupted by covert verbal retrieval , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The Higher-stratum Structure of Cognitive Abilities: Current Evidence Supports g and About Ten Broad Factors , 2003 .