Toward Alignment between Communities of Practice and Knowledge-Based Decision Support

The National Repository of Digital Forensics Information (NRDFI) is a knowledge repository for law enforcement digital forensics investigators (LEDFI). Over six years, the NRDFI has undertaken significant design revisions in order to more closely align the architecture of the system with theory addressing motivation to share knowledge and communication within ego-centric groups and communities of practice. These revisions have been met with minimal change in usage patterns by LEDFI community members, calling into question the applicability of relevant theory when the domain for knowledge sharing activities expands beyond the confines of an individual organization to a community of practice. When considered alongside an empirical study that demonstrated a lack of generalizability for existing theory on motivators to share knowledge, a call for deeper investigation is clear. In the current study, researchers apply grounded theory methodology through interviews with members of the LEDFI community to discover aspects of community context that appear to position communities of practice along a continuum between process focus and knowledge focus. Findings suggest that these contextual categories impact a community’s willingness to participate in various classes of knowledge support initiatives, and community positioning along these categories dictates prescription for design of knowledge based decision support systems beyond that which can be found in the current literature.

[1]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[3]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  B. Glaser The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted With Description , 2001 .

[5]  Theodore P. Stank,et al.  A Model of Logistics Outsourcing Strategy , 2008, Transportation Journal.

[6]  Grant Mccracken The long interview , 1988 .

[7]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[8]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  An agent-based framework for building decision support systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[10]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[11]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[13]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[14]  Jim Burkman,et al.  Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Diverse Organizational Contexts: An Argument for Reopening the Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Debate , 2009, AMCIS.

[15]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[16]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Using egocentric networks to understand communication , 2005, IEEE Internet Computing.

[17]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Developing Individuals' Transactive Memories of Their Ego-Centric Networks to Mitigate Risks of Knowledge Sharing: The Case of Professionals Protecting CyberSecurity , 2005, ICIS.