Design Potential Method for Robust System Parameter Design

A novel design potential method that integrates the probabilistic constraint evaluation closely into the design optimization process is presented for robust system parameter design. From a broader perspective, it is shown that the probabilistic constraints can be evaluated using either the conventional reliability index approach or the proposed performance measure approach. The performance measure approach is inherently robust and is more effective when the prohahilistic constraint is inactive. The reliability index approach is more effective for the violated probabilistic constraint, but it could yield singularity when the probabilistic constraint is inactive. Moreover, the close coupling of performance probability analysis and design optimization is illustrated in a proposed unified system space. The design potential method, which is developed to take full advantage of the important design information obtained from the previous probabilistic constraint evaluation, can significantly accelerate the convergence of the reliability-based design optimization process.

[1]  Z Zhao Introduction to Optimum Design Jasbir S. Arora, University of Iowa, USA McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989 626 pp., ISBN: 0-07-002460-X , 1990 .

[2]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY AND RELIABILITY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[3]  Yih‐Tsuen Wu,et al.  New Algorithm for Structural Reliability Estimation , 1987 .

[4]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  An Investigation of Nonlinearity of Reliability-Based Design Optimization Approaches , 2004, DAC 2002.

[5]  R. Scheaffer,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineers , 1986 .

[6]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  Optimization strategies in robust engineering design and computer‐aided design , 1993 .

[7]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2001 .

[8]  R. Grandhi,et al.  Efficient safety index calculation for structural reliability analysis , 1994 .

[9]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Probabilistic Structural Durability Prediction , 1998 .

[10]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimization in Structural Engineering , 1994 .

[11]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[12]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A mixed design approach for probabilistic structural durability , 1997 .

[13]  J. Hammersley SIMULATION AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD , 1982 .

[14]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[15]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Optimization algorithms for structural reliability , 1991 .

[16]  H. R. Millwater,et al.  AN ADVANCED PROBABILISTIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS METHOD FOR IMPLICIT PERFORMANCE FUNCTIONS , 1989 .

[17]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[18]  I. Enevoldsen,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimization as an Information Tool* , 1994 .

[19]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  DESIGN POTENTIAL CONCEPT FOR RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[20]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  A New Method for Efficient Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 1996 .

[21]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  General purpose procedure for reliability based structural optimization under parametric uncertainties , 1995 .

[22]  R. Grandhi,et al.  Reliability-based structural optimization using improved two-point adaptive nonlinear approximations , 1998 .

[23]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[24]  Kai Yang,et al.  Parameter and tolerance design in the engineering modelling stage , 1994 .

[25]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY AND RELIABILITY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[26]  Richard L. Scheaffer,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineers , 1986 .

[27]  Kendall E. Atkinson An introduction to numerical analysis , 1978 .

[28]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Reliability-Based Structural System Optimization: State-of-the-Art versus State-of-the-Practice , 1996 .