Environmental behaviours in initial professional development and their relationship with university education

Abstract This research explores whether university education provides young graduates studying subjects related to the environment with relevant knowledge and strategies for sustainability actions that they can put into practice in the workplace. It also reveals the difficulties and obstacles that graduates encounter in their professional careers to promote pro-environmental strategies in their companies or to maintain sustainable behaviours. Information for the qualitative research was obtained from semi-structured interviews with 70 graduates from eight assorted faculties spread across three campuses at the University of Zaragoza. The paper categorises the most widely detected barriers impeding the application of pro-environmental strategies in the workplace and considers whether these barriers are connected with university education. One of the most relevant conclusions is that a small number of graduates were involved in pro-environmental strategies and only when such strategies were promoted and developed by the firm itself. In these cases the graduates felt that they had been well prepared at the University. However, the majority had not participated in pro-environmental strategies and felt that their university education did not equip them properly for their involvement in environmental projects. This barrier is thus considered a very significant one. A previous research study developed with the same graduates tested a causal model that explained environmental attitudes and their connection with environmental behaviour. In the model, the intention or willingness to act came between attitudes and behaviours. In this work, the unwillingness to act is also shown to be a significant barrier to participating in pro-environmental strategies. As a conclusion, changes are suggested in the curriculum to include core competencies in sustainability in all degrees. It is also proposed that firms and universities establish organisational structures to promote effective sustainability and pro-environmental actions.

[1]  D. Mertens.  Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods , 1997 .

[2]  D. Hensher,et al.  Mapping Stakeholder Perceptions of the Importance of Environmental Issues and the Success in Delivery: A university case study , 2002 .

[3]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: DEFINITION AND CHARACTERISTICS EXPLORED , 2010 .

[4]  R. Lozano.  Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: an empirical example from Cardiff University , 2010 .

[5]  Nora Munguia,et al.  Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions , 2005 .

[6]  J. R. Royce,et al.  The search for meaning. , 1959 .

[7]  Marco Rieckmann,et al.  Developing Key Competencies for Sustainable Development in Higher Education , 2007 .

[8]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[9]  Michael Shriberg.  Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory , 2002 .

[10]  Steven J. Taylor.  Introduction to qualitative research methods , 1975 .

[11]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  Stakeholders and environmental management systems: a synergistic influence on environmental imbalance , 2011 .

[12]  Sabah A. Abdul-Wahab,et al.  The need for inclusion of environmental education in undergraduate engineering curricula , 2003 .

[13]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[14]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Incorporation of Sustainability Concepts into a Civil Engineering Curriculum , 2007 .

[15]  Mehran Nejati,et al.  Assessment of sustainable university factors from the perspective of university students , 2013 .

[16]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[17]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change , 2006 .

[18]  Michael Shriberg.  Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education , 2002 .

[19]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[20]  David Cuéllar Gálvez.  El desarrollo sostenible , 1995 .

[21]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[22]  Luis M. Rodríguez-Barreiro,et al.  Evaluation of environmental attitudes: Analysis and results of a scale applied to university students , 2007 .

[23]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Approach to a causal model between attitudes and environmental behaviour. A graduate case study , 2013 .

[24]  F. J. Lozano,et al.  Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system , 2013 .

[25]  Steven J. Taylor.  Introduction to qualitative research methods : the search for meanings / by Steven J. Taylor, Robert Bogdan , 1984 .

[26]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Educating change agents for sustainability – learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration , 2014 .

[27]  J. Edmister,et al.  Educating sustainable societies for the twenty‐first century , 2003 .

[28]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies , 2011 .

[29]  Suresh K. Tadisina,et al.  Exploring the impact of stakeholder pressure on environmental management strategies at the plant level: what does industry have to do with it? , 2015 .

[30]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Envisioning helps promote sustainability in academia: A case study at the University of Vermont , 2009 .

[31]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives , 2012 .

[32]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[33]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms , 2009 .

[34]  Cheryl Desha,et al.  Higher Education and Sustainable Development: A model for curriculum renewal , 2013 .

[35]  Tarah Wright,et al.  Giving “teeth” to an environmental policy: a Delphi Study at Dalhousie University , 2006 .

[36]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Higher education and sustainable development Exploring possibilities for organisational change , 2014 .

[37]  T. Cook,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research , 1981 .

[38]  Stephen Sterling,et al.  Sustainability Education: Perspectives and Practice across Higher Education , 2010 .

[39]  Karel Mulder,et al.  Integrating SD into engineering courses at the Delft University of Technology: the individual interaction method , 2004 .

[40]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Etnografía y diseño cualitativo en investigación educativa , 1988 .

[41]  Liyin Shen,et al.  An empirical study on the relationship between sustainability performance and business competitiveness of international construction contractors , 2015 .