ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading

In the process of reading compound words, those with high-frequency second constituents are recognized faster than the ones with low-frequency second constituents. However, the role of the first constituent still remains unclear. In the present study, the time course of the frequency effects for both constituents was assessed using Basque compound words embedded in sentences while electrophysiological measures (ERPs) were recorded (Basque is a language with a high frequency of compound words, both right and left-headed). Subjects responded to comprehension questions that were not focused on the compound words. The results revealed that high-frequency first constituents elicited larger negativities starting very early (100-300 ms time window), while low-frequency second constituents elicited larger N400 amplitudes than high-frequency second constituents. Following an activation-verification framework, we argue that the early negativity difference reflects candidate triggering, whereas the N400 difference for the second constituent reflects the cost of its selection and integration for the whole-word meaning to be accessed.

[1]  Gary Libben,et al.  Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment , 1998, Brain and Language.

[2]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[3]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Constituent priming effects: Evidence for preserved morphological processing in healthy old readers , 2009, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .

[5]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Morena Danieli,et al.  Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[8]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Andrews,et al.  Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .

[13]  P. Holcomb.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. Grainger,et al.  Sequential Effects of Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Psychological science.

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[16]  David Poeppel,et al.  Compound words and structure in the lexicon , 2007 .

[17]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[19]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) Reconsidered. , 1983 .

[20]  S. Andrews.  Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? , 1986 .

[21]  M. Taft.  Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[24]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence , 2003, Neuroreport.

[25]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study , 2004, Cognition.

[26]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[27]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[28]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  E-Hitz: A word frequency list and a program for deriving psycholinguistic statistics in an agglutinative language (Basque) , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[29]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[30]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[31]  M. Taft.  Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[32]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[33]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[34]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects , 2008 .

[35]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[36]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[37]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  I. Laka,et al.  Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words , 2009 .

[39]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .

[41]  A. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  A. Ellis.  Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[43]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Modeling morphological processing. , 1995 .

[44]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning , 2000 .

[45]  Gary Libben,et al.  Ambiguous Novel Compounds and Models of Morphological Parsing , 1999, Brain and Language.

[46]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[47]  Gary Libben,et al.  Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.

[48]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification , 2003 .

[49]  M. Carreiras,et al.  The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  J. Kounios,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[53]  Gary Libben,et al.  Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness , 2003, Brain and Language.

[54]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[55]  J. Debruille,et al.  The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[56]  M. Pratarelli.  Modulation of semantic processing using word length and complexity: an ERP study. , 1995, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[57]  Dirk Koester,et al.  The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs , 2007, Brain and Language.

[58]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Early Event-related Potential Effects of Syllabic Processing during Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Words and sentences: event-related brain potential measures. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[60]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing , 1994 .

[61]  M. Kutas.  Event related brain potential studies of language , 1988 .

[62]  H. Barber,et al.  Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs , 2004, Neuroreport.

[63]  A. Friederici,et al.  Morphosyntax, Prosody, and Linking Elements: The Auditory Processing of German Nominal Compounds , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .