In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE Previous studies suggest that MR imaging is capable of providing accurate data on knee joint cartilage volume and thickness in vitro, but the reproducibility of these data in living subjects has not been analyzed rigorously. Our aim was therefore to determine the in vivo reproducibility of volume and thickness measurements from replicated data sets, applying three-dimensional (3D) postprocessing methods. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Eight healthy volunteers were imaged six times at a resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm with a fat-suppressed fast low-angle shot 3D sequence, the knee being repositioned in between replicated examinations. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the articular cartilage surfaces were obtained from sagittal data sets, and the cartilage volumes were calculated. The thickness distribution was analyzed throughout the joint surfaces independent of the section orientation, using a previously validated 3D minimal-distance algorithm. RESULTS In the volunteers, the coefficient of variation for replicated volume measurements ranged from 1.3% (patella) to 3.4% (lateral tibia), and the standard deviation of the individual cartilage volumes ranged from +/- 16% (lateral tibia) to +/- 22% (femur). The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from .959 (lateral tibia) to .995 (patella). The interobserver evaluation was similar to the interscan reproducibility. The mean interscan deviation of the maximal cartilage thickness interval ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 cartilage thickness intervals (of 0.5 mm); only in rare cases did we record deviations greater than one thickness interval. CONCLUSION MR imaging can be used to determine cartilage volume and thickness in the knee joints of living subjects with high precision, provided that a fat-suppressed gradient-echo sequence with adequate resolution and 3D digital image processing are used.

[1]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.

[2]  F Eckstein,et al.  Computer-aided three dimensional assessment of knee-joint cartilage with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1991, Journal of Biomechanics.

[4]  F Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance chondro‐crassometry (MR CCM): A method for accurate determination of articular cartilace thickness? , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. F. Reiser,et al.  Geschlechtsspezifische Analyse der Knorpelvolumina des Kniegelenks — eine quantitative MRT-basierte Studie , 1998 .

[6]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Moderate running exercise augments glycosaminoglycans and thickness of articular cartilage in the knee joint of young beagle dogs , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  D W Piraino,et al.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  H. Potter,et al.  Imaging of chondral defects , 1997 .

[9]  I. Pataki,et al.  Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotibial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[10]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[11]  F Eckstein,et al.  Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  F Eckstein,et al.  A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 1: Development of a computational method. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  D G Disler,et al.  Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R. Putz,et al.  Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three‐dimensional magnetic resonance chondro‐crassometry (3D MR‐CCM) , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  D J Mikulis,et al.  Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three‐dimensional reconstruction , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  D G Disler,et al.  Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. , 1996, Radiology.

[19]  J. Bartko.  The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability , 1966, Psychological reports.

[20]  D Resnick,et al.  Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution. , 1991, Radiology.

[21]  V C Mow,et al.  Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  T Stammberger,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  F Eckstein,et al.  A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 2: Validation using CT arthrography. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  D Resnick,et al.  Assessment of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head: MR-anatomic correlation in cadavers. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  Should Perimenopausal Women Be Screened for Osteoporosis , 1986 .

[26]  M. Reiser,et al.  Assessment of normal patellar cartilage volume and thickness using MRI: an analysis of currently available pulse sequences , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[27]  J. Arokoski,et al.  Effect of motion and load on articular cartilage in animal models , 1992 .

[28]  D Resnick,et al.  Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  C. Herberhold,et al.  In situ measurement of articular cartilage deformation in intact femoropatellar joints under static loading. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  M. F. Reiser,et al.  NICHTINVASIVE ANALYSE DES KNORPELVOLUMENS UND DER KNORPELDICKE IM MENSCHLICHEN ELLBOGENGELENK MITTELS MRT , 1998 .

[31]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Thickness of patellofemoral articular cartilage as measured on MR imaging: sequence comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation , 1995, Skeletal Radiology.

[32]  T J Mosher,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: Role of contrast in lesion detection , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  R Huiskes,et al.  The biomechanics of the human patella during passive knee flexion. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Softening of canine articular cartilage after immobilization of the knee joint. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  T Stammberger,et al.  A method for quantifying time dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage as a function of tissue deformation in intact joints. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.