Clinical Evaluation of an Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming Strategy

The cochlear implant (CI) has been labeled the most successful neural prosthesis. Despite this success, a significant number of CI recipients experience poor speech understanding, and, even among the best performers, restoration to normal auditory fidelity is rare. While significant research efforts have been devoted to improving stimulation strategies, few developments have led to significant hearing improvement over the past two decades. We have recently introduced image processing techniques that open a new direction for advancement in this field by making it possible, for the first time, to determine the position of implanted CI electrodes relative to the nerves they stimulate using computed tomography images. In this article, we present results of an image-guided, patient-customized approach to stimulation that utilizes the electrode position information our image processing techniques provide. This approach allows us to identify electrodes that cause overlapping stimulation patterns and to deactivate them from a patient's map. This individualized mapping strategy yields significant improvement in speech understanding in both quiet and noise as well as improved spectral resolution in the 68 adult CI recipients studied to date. Our results indicate that image guidance can improve hearing outcomes for many existing CI recipients without requiring additional surgery or the use of ‘experimental' stimulation strategies, hardware or software. i 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

[1]  Darren M. Whiten Electro-anatomical models of the cochlear implant , 2007 .

[2]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[3]  Anthony J Spahr,et al.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Intracochlear Anatomy in Conventional CT , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Thomas Klenzner,et al.  Quality Control after Cochlear Implant Surgery by Means of Rotational Tomography , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic identification of cochlear implant electrode arrays for post-operative assessment , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Aaron Parkinson,et al.  Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Multicenter Clinical Study , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Speech Perception and Sound Localization by Adults with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2011 .

[9]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[10]  A. Thornton,et al.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[12]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  N. Cohen,et al.  Cochlear Implants , 2000 .

[14]  Karen M Mispagel,et al.  Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Image-Guidance Enables New Methods for Customizing Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Jim Graham,et al.  Robust Active Shape Model Search , 2002, ECCV.

[18]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[20]  G. Keidser,et al.  The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure , 2011, Audiology research.

[21]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Multicenter U.S. Bilateral MED-EL Cochlear Implantation Study: Speech Perception over the First Year of Use , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[22]  B. Green THE ORTHOGONAL APPROXIMATION OF AN OBLIQUE STRUCTURE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1952 .

[23]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[26]  René H. Gifford,et al.  Availability of Binaural Cues for Bilateral Implant Recipients and Bimodal Listeners with and without Preserved Hearing in the Implanted Ear , 2013, Audiology and Neurotology.

[27]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[29]  B C Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[30]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users , 2010, Hearing Research.

[31]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  David A Eddins,et al.  Spectral modulation masking patterns reveal tuning to spectral envelope frequency. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Johan H M Frijns,et al.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[34]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  René H. Gifford,et al.  Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant Programs , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[36]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[37]  Bernard Fraysse,et al.  The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[38]  Richard Ramsden,et al.  Speech Understanding in Noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ Cochlear Implant Using Reduced Channel Sets , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[39]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[40]  Soha N. Garadat,et al.  Erratum: Across-site patterns of modulation detection: Relation to speech recognition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 4030–4041 (2012)] , 2013 .

[41]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  A HarrisPaul,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009 .

[43]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  Erratum: “Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116(4), 2395–2405 (2004)] , 2006 .

[44]  Margaret W. Skinner,et al.  In Vivo Estimates of the Position of Advanced Bionics Electrode Arrays in the Human Cochlea , 2007 .

[45]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[46]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Assessment of Electrode Placement and Audiological Outcomes in Bilateral Cochlear Implantation , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[47]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[48]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[49]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  What'S new from NAL in hearing aid prescriptions? , 2006 .

[51]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[52]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Statistical Shape Model Segmentation and Frequency Mapping of Cochlear Implant Stimulation Targets in CT , 2012, MICCAI.

[53]  Anthony Spahr,et al.  Spectral cues for understanding speech in quiet and in noise , 2011, Cochlear implants international.

[54]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[55]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[56]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[57]  Jay T Rubinstein,et al.  How cochlear implants encode speech , 2004, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[58]  Anthony J Spahr,et al.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Validation of a Clinical Assessment of Spectral-Ripple Resolution for Cochlear Implant Users , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[61]  B J Gantz,et al.  Previous experience as a confounding factor in comparing cochlear-implant processing schemes. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[62]  René H. Gifford,et al.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: A non-language based measure of performance outcomes , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[63]  B. Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.