Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it

Serendipity is not an easy word to define. Its meaning has been stretched to apply to experiences ranging from the mundane to the exceptional. Serendipity, however, is consistently associated with unexpected and positive personal, scholarly, scientific, organizational, and societal events and discoveries. Diverse serendipitous experiences share a conceptual space; therefore, what lessons can we draw from an exploration of how serendipity unfolds and what may influence it? This article describes an investigation of work‐related serendipity. Twelve professionals and academics from a variety of fields were interviewed. The core of the semi‐structured interviews focused on participants' own work‐related experiences that could be recalled and discussed in depth. This research validated and augmented prior research while consolidating previous models of serendipity into a single model of the process of serendipity, consisting of: Trigger, Connection, Follow‐up, and Valuable Outcome, and an Unexpected Thread that runs through 1 or more of the first 4 elements. Together, the elements influence the Perception of Serendipity. Furthermore, this research identified what factors relating to the individual and their environment may facilitate the main elements of serendipity and further influence its perception.

[1]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information as thing , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Marija Norvaisaite,et al.  Review of: Fisher, Karen E., Erdelez, Sandra, and McKechnie, Lynne E.F. Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. 2005 , 2006, Inf. Res..

[3]  Kathleen Manning,et al.  Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Methodological Considerations Without Prescription , 1997 .

[4]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Designing a semantic sketchbook to create opportunities for serendipity , 2012, BCS HCI.

[5]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Case of the Floppy-Eared Rabbits: An Instance of Serendipity Gained and Serendipity Lost , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Ágústa Pálsdóttir Opportunistic discovery of information by elderly Icelanders and their relatives , 2011, Inf. Res..

[7]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Concepts: From Books to Cyberspace Identities , 2010, Information Concepts: From Books to Cyberspace Identities.

[8]  Catherine A. Johnson,et al.  Accidentally Found on Purpose: Information-Seeking Behavior of Historians in Archives , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[9]  Richard Cox,et al.  Attention design: Eight issues to consider , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[11]  Abigail McBirnie,et al.  Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[12]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: A process model , 2012, J. Documentation.

[13]  G. Fine,et al.  Three principles of Serendip : insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research , 1996 .

[14]  Miguel Pina e Cunha,et al.  Serendipity: Why Some Organizations are Luckier than Others , 2005 .

[15]  Pablo Forni,et al.  The travels and adventures of serendipity. A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science , 2012 .

[16]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  The bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization , 2012, CHI.

[17]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  A user-centred mobile diary study approach to understanding serendipity in information research , 2011, Inf. Res..

[18]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Are e-books replacing print books? tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across academic social media content serendipitously , 2012, ASIST.

[20]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The process of serendipity in knowledge work , 2010, IIiX.

[21]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[22]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  A flexible interface design for Web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[24]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Computer Models of Creativity , 2009, AI Mag..

[25]  P. Andel Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Orgin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[26]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Implicit human computer interaction through context , 2000, Personal Technologies.

[27]  Victoria L. Rubin,et al.  Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis , 2011, Inf. Res..

[28]  Julian Luxford,et al.  An English chronicle entry on Robin Hood , 2009 .

[29]  Elaine G. Toms,et al.  Browsing digital information : examining the 'affordances' in the interaction of user and text , 1997 .

[30]  Jannica Heinström Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition , 2006 .

[31]  Daniel Liestman Chance in the Midst of Design: Approaches to Library Research Serendipity. , 1992 .

[32]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Incidental Exposure to Online News , 2016, Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.

[33]  Lori McCay-Peet,et al.  INVESTIGATING WORK-RELATED SERENDIPITY, WHAT INFLUENCES IT,AND HOW IT MAY BE FACILITATED IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2014 .

[34]  R. S. Lenox,et al.  Educating for the serendipitous discovery , 1985 .

[35]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[36]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  UsingCitation Classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery , 1996, Scientometrics.

[37]  Umberto Eco Serendipities: Language & Lunacy , 1998 .

[38]  B. Dervin,et al.  Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin , 2003 .